Metal organic frameworks as catalysts and hydrocarbon oxidation methods thereof

ABSTRACT

A metal organic framework comprising zinc (II) ions and second metal ions, such as iron (II) ions, cobalt (II) ions, and copper (II) ions as nodes or clusters and coordinated 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid struts or linkers between them forming a porous coordination network in the form of polyhedral crystals that are isostructural to HKUST-1. Transmetallation processes for producing the metal organic frameworks, as well as methods for applications of the metal organic frameworks as catalysts, specifically catalysts for the oxidation of cyclic hydrocarbons, such as toluene, cyclohexane, and methylcyclohexane.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 62/335,954 filed May 13, 2016, the entire contents ofwhich are herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to metal organic frameworks comprisingzinc (II) ions and second metal ions, such as iron (II) ions, cobalt(II) ions, and copper (II) ions as nodes or clusters and coordinated1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid struts or linkers between them.Additionally, the present disclosure relates to processes for producingthe metal organic frameworks and their application as catalysts inmethods for the oxidation of cyclic hydrocarbons, such as toluene,cyclohexane, and methylcyclohexane.

Description of the Related Art

The “background” description provided herein is for the purpose ofgenerally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of thepresently named inventors, to the extent it is described in thisbackground section, as well as aspects of the description which may nototherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neitherexpressly or impliedly admitted as prior art against the presentinvention.

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline, highly porouscoordination polymers which are comprised of inorganic units (i.e.metals) coordinated to rigid organic fragments. They were built by anode linker approach that was first described by Robson [Hoskins, B. F.;Robson, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1546.—incorporated herein byreference in its entirety]. This method uses metal ions as nodes andorganic ligands as linkers. In this case, a metal ion with a preferredcoordination number and geometry combines with divergent ligandmolecules to form an extended 1D, 2D or 3D network or networks. Themetal linker interactions vary widely and have included ion-ioninteractions, ion-dipole, dipole-dipole, hydrogen bonding, anion-πinteractions, π-π interactions, as well as van-der Waals interactions[Burrows, A. D.; Chan, C. W.; Chowdhry, M. M.; McGrady, J. E.; Mingos,D. M. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 329; and Classens, C. G.; Stoddart, J. F.J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 254.—each incorporated herein by referencein its entirety]. The strength of these interactions has been proven todirectly influence the overall stability of the resulting framework[Braga, D. Chem. Comm. 2003, 2751-2754.—incorporated herein by referencein its entirety]. Extended networks can be developed from the basicprinciples guiding the formation of coordination complexes. FIG. 1 showsa representation of the formation of these coordination networks. Hence,the choice of metal center affects the resulting framework structurebecause a given metal has preference for a specific geometry andcoordination environment.

A second approach to the synthesis of MOFs was described by Yaghi[Eddaoudi, M.; Li, H.; Reineke, T.; Fehr, M.; Kelley, D.; Groy, T. L.;Yaghi, O. M. Topics in Catalysis 1999, 9, 105.; and Eddaoudi, M.; Moler,D. B.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Reineke, T. M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Acc.Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 319.—each incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety]. This involves the use of multiple organic ligands and linkersand metal ions or clusters (secondary building units, SBUs) as nodes.FIG. 2 shows a schematic illustration of this MOF synthesis andstructure. Most often, MOFs are easily synthesized by means ofhydrothermal or solvothermal synthesis which involve high temperatureself-assembly in a high boiling organic solvent or water in closedvessels [Yaghi, O. M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.;Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J. M Nature 2003, 423, 705-714.; and Stock, N.;Biswas, S. Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 933-969.; and Yaghi, O. M.; Li, H. L.J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 10401-10402.; and Lin, W. B.; Wang, Z. Y.;Ma, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11249-11250.; and Chui, S. S. Y.;Lo, S. M. F.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Orpen, A. G.; Williams, I. D. Science,1999, 283, 1148-1150.—each incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety]. However, these methods typically require long reaction times,from several hours up to several days, depending upon the nature of theligand, the reaction solvent, reagent concentrations and reactiontemperature. They can also be produced using the microwave assistedprocess which allows the large scale synthesis of MOFs in a few minutes[Feldblyum, J.; Liu, M.; Gidley, D.; Matzger, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,133, 18257-18263.; and Dybtsev, D. N.; Nuzhdin, A. L.; Chun, H.;Bryliakov, K. P.; Talsi, E. P.; Fedin, V. P.; Kim, K. Angew. Chem., Int.Ed., 2006, 45, 916-920.; and Ni, Z.; Masel, R. I.; J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2006, 128, 12394-12395.—each incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety].

MOF-5 is one of the first series of MOFs to be reported and fullycharacterized. It consists of an octahedral secondary building unit(SBU) which is made from Zn₄O (CO₂)₆ as an inorganic unit which iscomprised of four ZnO₄ tetrahedra with a common vertex and sixcarboxylate groups. These octahedral SBUs are joined together by benzenelinkers [Chalati, T.; Horcajada, P.; Gref, R.; Couvreur, P.; Serre, C.J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 2220-2227.—incorporated herein by referencein its entirety]. These unique units lead to a perfect cubic networkwhose vertices comprise the SBUs and the edges of which are made up ofthe benzene linkers. FIG. 3A shows the structure of MOF-5 in an extended3D cubic framework. This compound was synthesized from Zn(II) and1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (BDC) under organic conditionspredetermined to form the SBU in situ. FIG. 3B shows the topology of theMOF structure as a ball-and-stick model. FIG. 3C shows the structurerepresented by (OZn₄)O₁₂ clusters (tetrahedrons) joined by BDC ions(connectors). Since the benzene links and the SBUs appear to berelatively rigid and large entities, the resulting structure hasexceptionally high porosity (as indicated by its sorption) and stability[Yaghi, O. M., Sun, Z., Richardson, D. A. & Groy, T. L J. Am. Chem. Soc.1994, 116, 802-808.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety].

MOFs have been found to possess unique properties like high surfaceareas (up to 10400 m²/g) and tunable pores that can be used in variouspotential applications such as gas storage, catalysis, separation, anddrug delivery [Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O'Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M Nature1999, 402, 276-279.; and Silva, P.; Valente, A. A.; Rocha, J.; Paz, F.A. A. Cryst. Growth Des., 2010, 10, 2025-2028.; and Wang, Z.; Chen, G.;Ding, K. Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 322.; and Corma, A.; Garci'a, H.;Xamena, F. X. Chem. Rev., 2010, 23, 1126.; and Li, J. R.; Kuppler, R.J.; Zhou, H. C. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1477.—each incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety]. They have also been found to becandidates for other applications like microelectronics, sensing,optics, micromotors, molecular rotors, and bioreactors [Horcajada, P.;Chalati, T.; Serre, C.; Gillet, B.; Sebrie, C.; Baati, T.; Eubank, J.F.; Heurtaux, D.; Clayette, P.; Kreuz, C.; Chang, J. S.; Hwang, Y. K.;Marsaud, V.; Bories, P. N.; Cynober, L.; Gil, S.; Fe'rey, G.; Couvreur,P.; Gref, R. Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 172-178.; and Talin, A. A.; Centrone,A.; Ford, A. C.; Foster, M. E.; Stavila, V.; Haney, P.; Kinney, R. A.;Szalai, V.; Gabaly, F. E.; Yoon, H. P.; Le'onard, F.; Allendorf, M. D.Science, 2014, 343, 66.; and Kreno, L. E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O. K.;Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Hupp, T. Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1105.;and Cui, Y.; Yue, Y.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. Chem. Rev., 2012,112, 1126.;and Ikezoe, Y.; Washino, G.; Uemura, T.; Kitagawa, S.; Matsui, H. Nat.Mater., 2012, 11, 1081.; and Comotti, A.; Bracco, S.; Ben, T.; Qiu S.;Sozzani, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6655.—each incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety]. Presently, the most highlyrecognized applications of MOFs, however, have been in the areas of gasstorage and separation. The strong interest in this research area stemsfrom the urgent need to develop viable technologies for hydrogen fuelstorage for commercial use as well as to control the concentration ofCO₂ in the atmosphere.

High surface area and the possibility of varied structural modificationamongst other desirable physical and chemical properties make itpossible for MOFs to efficiently catalyze a broad range of reactions.The MOFs are usually modified by a method that is broadly known aspost-synthetic-modification (PSM). PSM makes it possible to incorporatea highly diverse range of different functional groups making it largelyfree of the restrictions resulting from the synthetic conditions of theMOFs. PSM also allows the introduction of multiple metal ions into asingle framework in a combinatorial manner, enabling an effective way tosystematically fine tune and optimize MOF properties [Doherty, C. M.;Grenci, G.; Riccoo', R.; Mardel, J. I.; Reboul, J.; Furukawa, S.;Kitagawa, S.; Hill, A. J.; Falcaro, P. Adv. Mater., 2013, 25,4701.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. The process inwhich new metal sites are incorporated into a MOF framework is known astransmetallation or post-synthetic metal exchange and the MOFs producedby this method can be described as isostructural MOFs with similarstructural frameworks but different metal ions. FIG. 4 illustrates ageneral scheme for the post-synthetic modification of MOFs. Thissynthetic method can be used to obtain certain MOFs that cannot beobtained via conventional synthetic methods. Cation exchange also helpsto enhance the properties of some MOFs by making it possible toincorporate a more useful metal site thereby improving some of theirphysical and chemical properties hence giving them more interestingapplications. For example, HKUST-1 has a surface area of about 1500 m²/gand it contains Cu²⁺ but the isostructure can be made by substitutingthe Cu²⁺ with other metals. A unique property of transmetallation liesin the fact that new MOFs can be obtained by complete or partialsubstitution of metal ions within the framework without altering themorphology of the MOFs. FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation for postsynthetic metal exchange or transmetallation. This process serves as analternative, typically milder route for accessing new MOFs whenconventional synthesis at high temperature fails [Wang, Z.; Cohen, SChem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1315-1329.—incorporated herein by referencein its entirety]. This substitution occurs at the metal nodes, oftencalled the inorganic clusters or secondary building units (SBUs).Although the metal ions are integral parts of the MOFs' structures, theycan be replaced either completely or partially within hours or dayswithout necessarily affecting the MOFs' structures [Dinca, M.; Long, J.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 11172-11176.—incorporated herein byreference in its entirety]. Transmetallation changes the properties ofthe MOFs and also makes them useful for other important applicationsespecially in catalysis. The transmetallated MOFs have multipleproperties having separate metal sites that can be utilized for specificcatalytic conversions of organic molecules.

The development of efficient new catalysts is still a serious challengein chemical research. Hence the increasing demand for safer and energysaving reaction routes promotes the need to develop new materialstowards the global aim of combating serious environmental challengesthat stem from several industrial processes. Hence, catalyst developmentis an ever growing area of research. Recently, chemists have endorsedMOFs as viable heterogeneous catalysts to channel the course of new andexisting chemical reactions to reduce industrial wastes and enablegreener chemical processes. This work facilitates better understandingof physical and chemical processes such as surface interactions andfacilitates novel concepts and ideas for the next generation ofcatalysts. The role of heterogeneous catalysts either in chemical orpetrochemical industries cannot be overemphasized. They reduce theenormous wastes that are associated with homogeneous catalysts and alsoreduce cost due to their reusability. These heterogeneous catalystsoccur in a different phase from the substrates and predominantly workbase on an adsorption mechanism. The heterogeneous catalysts are mostlysolids on which liquid or gaseous reaction mixtures are adsorbed. Theactive site may be either a planar exposed metal surface, a crystal edgewith imperfect metal valence or a complicated combination of the two.Thus, not only most of the volume, but also most of the surface of aheterogeneous catalyst may be catalytically inactive. The dependence ofcatalytic activity on surface area and pore volume makes MOF catalysts aviable area of chemical research. Investigating the nature of the activesites requires technically challenging research. Thus, studies relatingto new metal and ligand combinations for catalysis continue.

These highly porous, crystalline MOFs have some of the catalyticallyimportant properties of zeolites like uniform cavity and pore sizes aswell as medium to large internal surface areas [Wang, L, J.; Deng, H.;Furukawa, H.; Gandara, F.; Cordova, K. E.; Peri, D.; Yaghi, O. M. Inorg.Chem. 2014, 53, 5881-5883.—incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety]. Unlike zeolites, vast chemical varieties of MOFs can besynthesized due to the presence of infinite organic linkers. Thissuggests that the catalytic niche of MOFs is likely to be high valueadded reactions such as production of specific enantiomers, sensitivemolecules, as well as production of fine chemicals, which requirespecific and tunable catalytic sites [Furukawa, H.; Ko, N.; Go, Y. B.;Aratani, N.; Choi, S. B.; Choi,E.; Yazaydin, A.; Snurr, R. Q.; O'Keeffe,M.; Kim, J.; Yaghi, O. M. Science, 2010, 329, 424.; and Pan, L.; Adams,K. M.; Hernandez, H. E.; Wang, X.; Zheng, C.;Hattori, Y.; Kaneko, K. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,125, 3062.—each incorporated herein by reference inits entirety]. Despite the various interesting and compelling recentdevelopments in MOF catalysis, the area of MOF catalysis is still in animmature phase. Many researchers have likened MOF catalysis to enzymecatalysis, aiming towards the development of catalytic chemistry in thedirection of an “artificial enzyme”. Overall, the uniqueness of MOFsover other materials is yet to be fully illustrated since they have beenreported to be of use as catalysts in the chemical or petrochemicalindustries.

Oxidation reactions are among the most important chemical conversions inindustries and laboratories. Conversion of abundant and cheaphydrocarbons like toluene, cycloalkanes and methylcyclohexane into morevaluable chemicals like aldehydes, ketones and acids stands as asignificant process for consideration [Hayashi, H.; Cote, A. P.;Furukawa, H.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Nat. Mater. 2007,6,501.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. Among theseuseful transformations, the direct oxidation of toluene to producebenzaldehyde is an attractive process. Toluene oxidation gives a mixtureof oxygenated products like benzoic acid, benzyl alcohol, benzaldehydeand cresols. Commercially, benzaldehyde is mainly produced by thechlorination of toluene followed by the hydrolysis process, whichgenerates large amounts of toxic acidic/basic discard solutions, leadingto equipment corrosion and environmental pollution. Furthermore, thebenzaldehyde produced by this route is not qualified to synthesize somehigh quality compounds such as perfumes or pharmaceuticals because theproduct contains chlorine [Friedrich Brihne and Elaine Wright“Benzaldehyde” in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 2002,Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety].Therefore, there is a clear need to develop new materials to improve theselective oxidation of toluene as an alternative route to producebenzaldehyde and consequently benzoic acids.

Alkanes are naturally abundant and cheap carbon containing raw materialwhich serve as attractive substrates for the production of value addedorganic chemicals (alcohols, ketones, aldehydes and carboxylic acids)[B. Retcher, J. S. Costa, J. Tang, R. Hage, P. Gamez, J. Reedijk, J.Mol. Catal. A. 2008, 286, 1-5.—incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety]. Unfortunately, the chemical inertness of these compounds is aconsiderable limitation towards their vast application for directsyntheses of oxygenated products under relatively mild conditions.However, a proper metal catalyst and an appropriate oxidizing agent, aswell as properly controlled reaction conditions, can lead to thedevelopment of a cleaner and more efficient chemical industry. Today,over a billion tons of cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol are produced everyyear and they are mostly used for the synthesis of Nylon-66 and Nylon-6[M. Musser “Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone” in Ullmann's Encyclopedia ofIndustrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.—incorporated herein byreference in its entirety].

The structure of HKUST-1 and Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks hasbeen investigated. Chui and coworkers were the first to synthesizeHKUST-1 at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. HKUST-1was discovered to be a highly porous metal coordination polymer[Cu₃(BTC)₂(H₂O)₃]_(n) (where BTC is benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) whichhas interconnected [Cu₂(O₂CR)_(4]) units (where R is an aromatic ring),C₁₈H₁₂O₁₅Cu₃. It creates a 3-dimensional system of channels with a poresize of approximately 1 nm and an accessible porosity of about 40% inthe solid. The single crystal structural analysis of HKUST-1 revealedthat the polymer framework is composed of dimeric cuprictetracarboxylate building units, with a Cu—Cu inter-nuclear separationof 2.628(2) Å . FIG. 6 shows the crystal structure of the dicopper (II)tetracarboxylate building block containing two axial aqua ligands. Theframework was found to be neutral because the twelve carboxylate oxygensfrom the two BTC ligands bind to four coordination sites for each of thethree Cu²⁺ ions of the formula unit. Hence each Cu atom completes ispseudo-octahedral coordination sphere with the presence of axial aqualigands opposite to the Cu—Cu dimer. The tetracarboxylate unit providesa structural motif with potential four-fold symmetry, and the trimesicacid provides a three-fold symmetry element. FIG. 7 shows a HKUST-1secondary building unit (SBU) demonstrating the tbo net topology and thepaddlewheel structure. The origin of the nanochannels can be clearlyconsidered to arise from the formation of larger octahedral secondarybuilding units (SBUs). The main SBU in HKUST-1 is the octahedral unitwith Cu₂ at its 6 vertices and 4 trimesate ions tetrahedrally disposedas “panels” for four of the eight triangular faces of the octahedron.FIG. 8 shows the [Cu₃(TMA)₂(H₂O)₃] unit viewed along the cell bodydiagonal, demonstrating a hexagonal-n shaped window at the intersectionof the nanopores. FIG. 9 shows the polymer framework and nanochannelswith four-fold symmetry.

The Zn-HKUST-1 that contains Zn²⁺ ions is analogous to HKUST-1. Analysisof Zn-HKUST-1 by powder X-ray diffraction and gas sorption shows theretention of crystalline structure but negative nitrogen uptake at 77 Kdue to a dense surface layer that prevents the passage of smallmolecular species into the crystal framework [Bhunia, M. K, Hughes, J.T. Fettinger, J. C. and Navrotsky, A. Langmuir 2013, 29,8140-8145.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. Theprevalence of zinc paddlewheels in a variety of MOFs, such as thepreviously discussed HKUST-1 suggests that Zn I a promising metal withwhich an isostructural analog to Cu-HKUST-1 can be constructed.

The application of metal organic frameworks has been investigated. Overthe past decades, transition metal complexes comprising mainly phosphineligands, salen or salophen ligands, pincer ligands and N-heterocycliccarbenes (NHCs) have had a remarkable impact on catalysis. Examplesinclude the Nobel prize winning Noyori asymmetric hydrogenation,Sharpless oxidations (Sharpless epoxidation, Sharpless asymmetricdihydroxylation, and Sharpless oxyamination) as well as Jacobsenepoxidation [Noyori, R Adv. Synth. Catul 2003, 345, 12, 15-41.; andKatsuki, T.; Sharpless, K. B J Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 5974-5976.;and Jacobsen, E. N.; Marko, T.; Mungall, W. S.; Schroeder, G.;Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110 1968-1970.; and Sharpless,K. B; Patrick, D. W.; Truesdale, L. K.; Biller, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.,1975, 97, 2305 2307.; and Zhang, W.; Loebach, J. L.; Wilson, S. R.;Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 7, 2801-2803.—eachincorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. Most of these metalcomplexes have only been successful as homogeneous catalysts which havesignificant disadvantages like the difficulty of product separation,poor reusability and toxicity. Relatively insoluble and stable materialslike zeolites, metals and metal oxides are widely used as heterogeneouscatalyst on the industrial scale. Notable conversions like theHarber-Bosch, Contact process, Ostwald process, steam reforming,petrochemical reactions Ziegler Natta polymerization make use of theseinsoluble materials. In terms of easy post reaction separation, thesematerials have largely been successful. However, there is still anurgent need for the development of new materials that will be moreenergy efficient, more tunable, and more environmentally friendly.

MOFs have shown great catalytic prospects for a wide range of reactionsdue to the diversity in their structures, low toxicity, reusability andcost effectiveness. In fact MOFs are among the best candidates inbridging the gap between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Themetals in the MOF structure often act as Lewis acids especially when theframeworks are activated by removing the coordinated labile solventmolecules or counter ions [Han, J. W.; Hill, C. L.; J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2007, 129, 15094.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety].Fujita, et al. first reported the catalytic activity of a 2D Cd(II)based MOF for the cyanosilylation of aldehydes. Thy obtained theunsaturated metal cluster by removing two water molecules from theoctahedral structure of [Cd(4,4′-bpy)₂(H₂O)₂].(NO₃)₂.4H₂O [Fujita, M.;Kwon, Y. J.; Washizu, S.; Ogura, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,1151-1152.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. Fe(BTC)has also been used as a heterogeneous catalyst for the selectivemethylation of primary aromatic amines using dimethyl carbonate,efficient oxidation of benzylic compounds using t-butyl-hydroperoxide asoxidizing agent, and oxidation of thiols to disulfides[Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; Garcia, H. Appl. Catal. A: General2010, 378, 19-25.; and Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; Garcia, H. J.Catal. 2009, 267, 1-4.; and Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; Garcia, H.Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6476-6478.—each incorporated herein byreference in its entirety]. Seo, et al. first reported asymmetriccatalysis using a homochiral MOF, [Zn(μ₃-O)(1-H)₆.2H₃O.12H₂O] fortransesterification reactions. It was also the first MOF demonstratingthat the organic linker embedded into a pore can catalyze an asymmetricreaction [Seo, J. S.; Whang, D.; Lee, H.; Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.; Jeon, Y.J.; Kim, K. Nature, 2000, 404, 982-986.—incorporated herein by referencein its entirety]. Lin, et al. also reported the activity of a homochiralnon-interpenetrating MOF which was constructed in finite 1-dimensional[Cd(μ-Cl)₂]_(n) zigzag chains with axial bipyridine bridging ligandscontaining orthogonal secondary functional groups [Wu, C.; Hu, A.;Zhang, L.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8940-8941.—incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety]. The chiral secondary functionalgroups were used to generate a heterogeneous asymmetric catalyst for theaddition of diethyl zinc to aromatic aldehydes to afford chiralsecondary alcohols at up to 93% enantiomeric excess (ee).

More specifically, the catalytic activity of HKUST-1 has beeninvestigated. HKUST-1 has been particularly well recognized for its highcatalytic activity especially when the axial aqua ligands are removedvia activation. FIG. 10 illustrates schematically the activation ofHKUST-1. Activation gives unsaturated metal sites without affecting therigid framework of the MOF [Schlichte, K.; Kratzke, T.; Kaskel, S.;Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2004, 73: 81-85.; and Lien T. L.Nguyen, Tung T. Nguyen, Khoa D. Nguyen, Nam T. S. Phan Applied CatalysisA: General, 2012, 425, 44-52.—each incorporated herein by reference inits entirety]. Schlichte, et al. first reported the catalytic activityof HKUST-1 when they used the HKUST-1 MOF for the trimethylcyanosilationof benzaldehyde. The open framework of this MOF was activated byremoving the two water molecules from axial positions in the octahedralframework. The activated MOF afforded up to 57% conversion ofbenzaldehyde reaching a selectivity of 89% at 313 K. Nguyen, et al.studied the activity of HKUST-1 for the aza-michael reaction in whichamines were reacted with α,β-unsaturated carbonyl groups to prepareβ-amino carbonyl compounds and their derivatives. They achievedexcellent conversions up to 100% under relatively mild conditions in thepresence of 5 mol % activated catalyst. Fourier transform infraredspectroscopy (FT-IR) and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysisrevealed that the catalyst could be reused several times without asignificant reduction in its catalytic potency. Atomic absorptionspectroscopy showed that the reaction was not influenced by homogeneouscatalysis resulting from leached active species.

Using the same material, Phan, et al. was able to react phenols and aryliodides to form diaryl ethers in an Ullman-type coupling reaction. Theheterogeneous reaction leads to high conversion using 5 mol % catalystin the presence of MeONa as a base. The used catalyst was facilelyrecovered from the reaction mixture using simple filtration and could bereused without significant degradation [Nam T. S. Phan, Tung T. Nguyen,Chi V. Nguyen, Thao T. Nguyen Applied Catalysis A: General., 2013, 457,69-77.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. Phan, et al.also reported the highly efficient activity of HKUST-1 for theC-arylation of acetylacetone in the presence of aryl iodides to obtainaryl ketones as major products. HKUST-1 was confirmed to be a trueheterogeneous catalyst as there was no effect of homogeneous catalysisof active species leaching into the reaction mixture [Nam T. S. Phan,Tung T. Nguyen, Phuong Ho, and Khoa D. Nguyen ChemCatChem. 2013, 5,1822-1831.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. Dang, etal. studied the catalytic activity of HKUST-1 for the synthesis ofpropargylamine via direct oxidative C—C coupling reaction using C—Hfunctionalization between phenylacetylene and N,N-dimethylaniline togive N-methyl-N-(3-phenylprop-2-ynyl)benzenamine as the principalproduct [Giao H. Dang, Duy T. Nguyen, Dung T. Le, Thanh Truong, Nam T.S. Phan Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, 2014, 300, 306.—incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety]. The copper catalyzed reactionafforded 96% conversion after 180 minutes at 120° C. in the presence of5 mol % copper-based catalyst. The used catalyst was recovered from thereaction medium by filtration and reused for the coupling reaction.Similarly, HKUST-1 has been used as a catalyst for the direct oxidativeamination of sp² C—H bonds. The reaction involves the use ofN-methylmorpholine oxide (NMO) as oxidizing agent in the presence ofprimary or secondary amine as coupling pairs with DMF as solvent at90-100° C. [Nga T. T. Tran, Quan H. Tran, Thanh T. Journal of Catalysis,2014, 320, 9-15.—incorporated herein by reference in its entirety].

In view of the forgoing, one object of the present disclosure is toprovide relatively cheap and environmentally friendly metal organicframework catalysts designed towards laboratory and industrial scalecatalytic applications as opposed to uses in gas storage and carboncapture. Metal organic framework catalysts provide great potential fornew and existing chemical reactions for shortest route organicconversions that reduce industrial wastes and enable greener chemicalprocesses through their high tunability, high surface area, stability,and reusability. Specifically, this disclosure is focused onisostructural HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks comprising zinc (II)metal ions and second metal ions, such as iron (II) ions, cobalt (II)ions, and copper (II) ions linked by 1,3,5-benzentricarboxylic acid toform a porous coordination network as polyhedral crystals. Thisdisclosure provides the transmetallation preparation of these metalorganic frameworks by post-synthetic metallic exchange of thesolvothermally synthesized Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework. Anadditional aspect of the present disclosure is application of thesemetal organic frameworks as catalysts in methods for the liquid phaseoxidation of cyclic hydrocarbons, such as, toluene, cyclohexane, andmethylcyclohexane. It is envisioned that the metal organic frameworks ofthe present disclosure will exhibit strong activity in terms ofconversion of the cyclic hydrocarbon, selectivity for a desired oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon product, and reusability. Overall, the metal organicframeworks are envisaged to exhibit strong potential utility ascatalysts that aid the increasing demand for safer and energy savingreaction routes that additionally reduce and minimize the adverseenvironmental impact of industrial wastes.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect, the present disclosure relates to a metalorganic framework catalyst comprising i) zinc (II) ions, ii) secondmetal ions which are not zinc (II) ions, and iii)benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands, wherein thebenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands comprise carboxylate groups,each carboxylate group forming a coordinative bond to the zinc (II) ionsor the second metal ions to form a coordination network in the form ofporous polyhedral crystals that are isostructural to an HKUST-1 metalorganic framework.

In one embodiment, the second metal ions are at least one selected fromthe group consisting of iron (II) ions, cobalt (II) ions, and copper(II) ions.

In one embodiment, the ratio of zinc (II) ions to the additional metalions is in the range of 0.01 to 5.0.

In one embodiment, the porous polyhedral crystals have pores with anaverage diameter of 0.2-2.0 nm and a BET surface area in the range of500-3000 m²/g.

In one embodiment, the porous polyhedral crystals are octahedral orcubic with an average longest linear dimension in the range of 2-20 μm.

In one embodiment, the metal organic framework catalyst has a largerunit cell dimension a than the HKUST-1 metal organic framework.

In one embodiment, the second metal ions are copper (II) ions and theratio of zinc (II) ions to copper (II) ions is in the range of 0.01 to1.0.

In one embodiment, the second metal ions are at least one selected fromthe group consisting of iron (II) ions and cobalt (II) ions and theratio of zinc (II) ions to the second metal ions is in the range of0.5-5.0.

According to a second aspect, the present disclosure relates to aprocess for producing the metal organic framework in any of itsembodiments comprising i) reacting 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid witha zinc (II) salt or hydrate in a solvent at a temperature greater than25° C. to form a zinc modified metal organic framework and ii)transmetallating at least a portion of the zinc modified metal organicframework by immersing in a solution of a salt or hydrate of the secondmetal ions.

According to a third aspect, the present disclosure relates to a methodfor an oxidation of a cyclic hydrocarbon comprising contacting thecyclic hydrocarbon with the metal organic framework catalyst in any ofits embodiments in the presence of a solvent and an oxidizing agent toform an oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is at least one selected fromthe group consisting of toluene, cyclohexane, and methylcyclohexane.

In one embodiment, the solvent is acetonitrile and the oxidizing agentis hydrogen peroxide.

In one embodiment, the contacting is performed at a temperature in therange of 40-100° C. for a time period of 2-36 hours.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and 15-80% of thetoluene is converted to the oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon at a reactiontime of greater than 6 hours.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and the method hasa benzaldehyde selectivity in the range of 15-70% relative to a totalamount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and the method hasa benzaldehyde selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products greater than or equal to a benzaldehyde selectivityrelative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of asubstantially similar method performed in a substantially similar mannerwith a substantially similar metal organic framework catalyst lackingthe zinc (II) ions, the second metal ions, or both.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and the secondmetal ions are iron (II) ions and the oxidation has a benzaldehydeselectivity of greater than 55% relative to a total amount of oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon products.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is at least one selected fromthe group consisting of cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane and 10-60% ofthe cyclic hydrocarbon is converted to the oxidized cyclic hydrocarbonat a reaction time of greater than 12 hours.

In one embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is cyclohexane and the methodhas a cyclohexane selectivity in the range of 45-80% relative to a totalamount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products.

In one embodiment, the method further comprises recovering and reusingthe metal organic framework catalyst in at least 2 reaction iterationswith a less than 20 percentage point decrease in conversion,selectivity, or both.

The foregoing paragraphs have been provided by way of generalintroduction, and are not intended to limit the scope of the followingclaims. The described embodiments, together with further advantages,will be best understood by reference to the following detaileddescription taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete appreciation of the disclosure and many of the attendantadvantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes betterunderstood by reference to the following detailed description whenconsidered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation demonstrating the extension of theprinciples guiding the formation of metal coordination complexes tometal organic framework (MOF) coordination networks

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the synthesis and structure ofmetal organic frameworks (MOFs) from organic linkers and secondarybuilding units (SBUs) comprising metal ions or clusters.

FIG. 3A is a schematic representation of MOF-5 represented as ZnO₄tetrahedra linked by benzene dicarboxylate (BDC) organic linkers to forman extended 3D cubic framework with interconnected pores ofapproximately 8 Å aperture width and approximately 12 Å pore diameter asrepresented by the sphere.

FIG. 3B is a schematic representation of the topology of the MOF-5structure shown as a ball-and-stick model with (OZn₄)O₁₂ clusters asballs and benzene dicarboxylate (BDC) connectors as sticks.

FIG. 3C is a schematic representation of the topology of the MOF-5structure shown with tetrahedra representing (OZn₄)O₁₂ clusters andconnections representing benzene dicarboxylate (BDC) ions where opposinglines are all at exactly 90°.

FIG. 4 is a general scheme for the post synthetic modification of MOFs.

FIG. 5 is a general schematic diagram for post synthetic metal exchangeof a MOF structure, or transmetallation of a MOF structure.

FIG. 6 is a single crystal structural analysis of a HKUST-1 dicopper(II) tetracarboxylate building block containing two axial aqua ligands.

FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a secondary building unit (SBU)of HKUST-1 showing the tbo net topology and paddlewheel structure wherethe tetracarboxylate unit provides a structural unit with four-foldsymmetry and the trimesic acid provides a three-fold symmetry element.

FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of the larger main octahedralsecondary building unit (SBU) of HKUST-1 [Cu₃(TMA)₂(H₂O)₃] viewed alongthe cell body diagonal, showing a hexagonal-n shaped window at theintersection of the nanopores and giving rise to the nanochannels.

FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of the HKUST-1 polymer frameworknanochannels with four-fold symmetry, formed from an octahedralsecondary building unit (SBU) with Cu₂ at its 6 vertices and 4 trimesateions tetrahedrally disposed as “panels” for four of the eight triangularfaces of the octahedron

FIG. 10 is a general schematic representation of the activation of theHKUST-1 metal organic framework by removal of axial aqua ligands to giveunsaturated metal sites without affecting the rigid framework of theMOF.

FIG. 11 is the general scheme and procedure for the synthesis of theprepared HKUST-1 metal organic framework from Cu(NO₃)₂.3H₂O and1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC).

FIG. 12 is the general scheme and procedure for the synthesis of theprepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework from Zn(NO₃)₂.6H₂O and1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC).

FIG. 13 is a Fourier transform infrared (FT-TR) spectrum of1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC).

FIG. 14 is a FT-IR spectrum of the prepared HKUST-1 metal organicframework.

FIG. 15 is a FT-IR spectrum of the prepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework.

FIG. 16 is a FT-IR spectrum of the prepared Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework after transmetallation.

FIG. 17 is a FT-IR spectrum of the prepared Co—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework after transmetallation.

FIG. 18 is a FT-IR spectrum of the prepared Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework after transmetallation.

FIG. 19 is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the preparedHKUST-1 metal organic framework at a magnified view.

FIG. 20 is a SEM image of the prepared HKUST-1 metal organic framework.

FIG. 21 is a SEM image of the prepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework at a magnified view.

FIG. 22 is a SEM image of the prepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework.

FIG. 23 is a powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern for the simulatedHKUST-1 metal organic framework and the prepared experimental HKUST-1metal organic framework.

FIG. 24 is a PXRD pattern for the simulated Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework and the prepared experimental Zn-HKUST-1 metal organicframework.

FIG. 25 is a comparative PXRD analysis showing PXRD patterns of theprepared Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework after transmetallationand the prepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework.

FIG. 26 is a comparative PXRD analysis showing PXRD patterns of theprepared Co—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework after transmetallationand the prepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework.

FIG. 27 is a comparative PXRD analysis showing PXRD patterns of theprepared Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework after transmetallationand the prepared Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic framework.

FIG. 28 is the chemical equation and general scheme for the oxidation oftoluene.

FIG. 29 is the chemical equation and general scheme for the oxidation ofcyclohexane.

FIG. 30 is the chemical equation and general scheme for the oxidation ofmethylcyclohexane.

FIG. 31 is a comparative PXRD analysis showing PXRD patterns of theunused prepared HKUST-1 metal organic framework and the used preparedHKUST-1 metal organic framework after use as a catalyst in the oxidationof a cyclic hydrocarbon.

FIG. 32 is a graph showing the percent conversion and the percentbenzaldehyde selectivity of the prepared HKUST-1 metal organic frameworkafter a single and multiple runs as a catalyst in the oxidation oftoluene.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the drawings, wherein, like reference numeralsdesignate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views.Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described more fullyhereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some,but not all of the embodiments of the disclosure are shown.

Within the description of this disclosure, where a numerical limit orrange is stated, the endpoints are included unless stated otherwise.Also, all values and subranges within a numerical limit or range arespecifically included as if explicitly written out. As used herein, thewords “a” and “an” and the like carry the meaning of “one or more”. Thephrases “selected from the group consisting of”, “chosen from”, and thelike include mixtures of the specified materials. Terms such as“contain(s)” and the like are open terms meaning “including at least”unless otherwise specifically noted.

According to a first aspect, the present disclosure relates to a metalorganic framework catalyst comprising i) zinc (II) ions, ii) secondmetal ions which are not zinc (II) ions, and iii)benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands, wherein thebenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands comprise carboxylate groups,each carboxylate group forming a coordinative bond to the zinc (II) ionsor the second metal ions to form a coordination network in the form ofporous polyhedral crystals that are isostructural to an HKUST-1 metalorganic framework.

As used herein, a metal organic framework (MOF) refers to compoundsconsisting of metal ions or clusters coordinated to organic ligands toform one, two, or three dimensional structures. They are a subclass ofcoordination polymers and are often porous. The organic ligands includedare sometimes referred to as “struts”, one preferable example beingtrimesic acid or benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (C₉H₆O₆). Moreformally, a metal organic framework is a coordination network withorganic ligands containing potential voids. As used herein, acoordination network is a coordination compound extending, throughrepeating coordination entities, in one dimension, but with cross-linksbetween two or more individual chains, loops, or spirolinks, or acoordination compound extending through repeating coordination entitiesin two or three dimension; and finally a coordination polymer is acoordination compound with repeating coordination entities extending inone, two or three dimensions. In most cases, the pores are stable duringelimination of the guest molecules (often solvents) and metal organicframeworks find use for the storage of gases such as hydrogen and carbondioxide, gas purification, gas separation, catalysis, sensors, andsupercapacitors.

Generally, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are composed of two majorcomponents, (i) a metal ion or cluster of metal ions and (ii) an organicmolecule called a linker. These materials may often be referred to ashybrid organic-inorganic materials. The organic units are typicallymono-, di-, tri-, or tetravalent ligands. The choice of metal and linkerdictates the structure and hence properties of the MOF. For example, themetal's coordination preference influences the size and shape of poresby dictating how many ligands can bind to the metal and in whichorientation.

As used herein, catalysis is an increase in the rate of a chemicalreaction due to the participation of an additional substance termed acatalyst. Reactions tend to occur faster with a catalyst because thereaction requires less activation energy. Furthermore, since they arenot consumed in the catalyzed reaction, catalysts can continue to actrepeatedly, and often only tiny amounts are require. As used herein,heterogeneous catalyst refers to catalysts where the phase of thecatalyst differs from that of the reactants or substrates. As usedherein, homogeneous catalyst refers to catalysts where the phase of thecatalyst is the same as that of the reactants. In terms of the presentdisclosure, the metal organic framework in any of its embodiments mayfunction as a heterogeneous catalyst, a homogeneous catalyst, or havecomponents that function and have properties of both a heterogeneouscatalyst and a homogeneous catalyst. In a preferred embodiment, themetal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosure in any of itsembodiments functions as a heterogeneous catalyst. Preferably the metalorganic framework catalyst composition is employed in at least onechemical transformation, preferably an oxidation, preferably a selectiveoxidation

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) may often be employed as heterogeneouscatalysts. Their high surface area, tunable porosity, diversity in metaland functional groups make them especially attractive for use ascatalysts. Similarly, zeolites are often employed in catalysis; however,zeolites are limited by the fixed tetrahedral coordination of the Si/Alconnecting points and the two-coordinated oxide linkers and onlyapproximately 200 zeolites are known. In contrast with this limitedscope, MOFs exhibit more diverse coordination geometries, polytopiclinkers, and ancillary ligands (i.e. F⁻, OH⁻, H₂O among others). It isalso challenging to obtain zeolites with pore sizes larger than 1 nm,which limits the catalytic applications of zeolites to relatively smallorganic molecules (typically no larger than xylenes). Furthermore, mildsynthetic conditions typically employed for MOF synthesis allow directincorporation of delicate functionalities into the framework structures.Such a process would not be possible with zeolites or other microporouscrystalline oxide-based materials because of the harsh conditionstypically used for their synthesis (e.g. calcination at hightemperatures to remove organic templates).

Additionally, zeolites still cannot be obtained in enantiopure form,which precludes their applications in catalytic asymmetric synthesis,essential for use in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical and fragranceindustries. Enantiopure chiral ligands or their metal complexes havebeen incorporated into MOFs leading to efficient asymmetric catalysts.Even some MOF materials may bridge the gap between zeolites and enzymeswhen they combine isolated polynuclear sites, dynamic host-guestresponses, and a hydrophobic cavity environment. Theoreticalcalculations show that MOFs are semiconductors or insulators with bandgaps between 1.0 and 5.5 eV which can be altered by changing the degreeof conjugation in the ligands indicating the further possibility oftheir use as photocatalysts. Like other heterogeneous catalysts, MOFsmay allow for easier post-reaction separation and recyclability thanhomogeneous catalysts. In several cases, they also give highly enhancedcatalyst stability. Further, MOFs typically offer substrate-sizeselectivity.

Generally, the metal ions, preferably transition metal ions, used cangenerate a wide range of structures. The properties of these metals,including the oxidation state and coordination number, preferably 2 to7, produce a linear, trigonal, square planar, tetrahedral, trigonalpyramidal, trigonalbipyramidal, octahedral, and pentagonal bipyramidalgeometries as well as some distorted forms. In a preferred embodiment,the metal organic framework of the present disclosure in any of itsembodiments comprises zinc (II) ions and second metal ions which are notzinc (II) ions. Exemplary suitable second metal ions include, but arenot limited to, Ag, Ca, K, Zn, Na, Pb, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Al, Cu, Sn, Cd,Hg, Cr, Fe, Bi, Ga, Ge, Au, In, TI, Rb, Cs, As, Sb, Cr, Zn, V, Pt, Pd,Rh, and mixtures thereof. Further, these metal ions may be of anyoxidation state M⁺¹, M⁺², M⁺³, etc., preferably M⁻². In a preferredembodiment, the second metal ions are at least one selected from thegroup consisting of Ag⁺, Al³⁻, Bi³⁺, Ce⁴⁺, Cr³⁺, Co²⁺, Cu²⁺, Fe³⁺, Mn²⁺,Mg²⁺, Pd²⁺, Sc³⁺, V⁴⁺, Zn²⁺, and Zr⁴⁺. In a most preferred embodimentthe second metal ions are at least one selected from the groupconsisting of iron (II) ions, cobalt (II) ions, and copper (II) ions. Itis equally envisaged that the metal organic framework of the presentdisclosure may be adapted to further comprise one or more additionalmetal ions in addition to or in lieu of the zinc (II) metal ions andsecond metal ions. Exemplary additional metal ions include, but are notlimited to, an alkali metal (Li, Na, K, etc.), an alkaline earth metal(Mg, Ca, Sr, etc.) a lanthanide metal (La, Ce, Eu, Yb, etc.), anactinide metal (Ac, Th, etc.), or a post-transition metal (Al, Sn, Pb,In, etc.).

In the formation of a metal organic framework, the organic linkers mustmeet certain requirements to form coordination bonds, primarily beingmultidentate, having at least two donor atoms (i.e. N—, O—, and/or S—)and being neutral and being neutral or anionic. The structure of themetal organic framework is also affected by the shape, length, andfunctional groups present in the organic linker. In certain embodiments,the metal organic framework of the present disclosure comprises anionicligands as organic linkers, preferably polycarboxylates including, butnot limited to, di-, tri-, tetra-, and/or hexacarboxylates. In apreferred embodiment, the metal organic framework of the presentdisclosure in any of its embodiments comprisesbenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid, C₉H₆O₆) ligands as theligands, linkers, or struts. The benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acidligands comprise carboxylate groups, with each carboxylate groupsforming a coordinative bond to the zinc (II) metal ions or the secondmetal ions as the nodes, metal ions, or clusters of metal ions to form acoordination network. It is equally envisaged that the metal organicframework of the present disclosure may be adapted to further compriseone or more additional organic ligands in addition to or in lieu of thebenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands including, but not limited to,bidentate carboxylics, tridentate carboxylates, azoles, neutral ligands,and squaric acid (3,4-dihydroxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione, C₄H₂O₄).Exemplary suitable bidentate carboxylics include, but are not limited tooxalic acid (ethanedioic acid, HOOC—COOH), malonic acid (propanedioicacid, HOOC—(CH₂)—COOH), succinic acid (butanedioic acid,HOOC—(CH₂)₂—COOH), glutaric acid (pentanedioic acid, HOOC—(CH₂)₃—COOH),phthalic acid (benzene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid, o-phthalic acid,C₆H₄(COOH)₂), isophthalic acid (benzene-1,3-dicarboxylic acid,m-phthalic acid, C₆H₄(COOH)₂), terephthalic acid(benzene-1,4-dicarboxylic acid, BDC, p-phthalic acid, C₆H₄(COOH)₂),biphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid, BPDC, HOOC—(C₆H₄)₂—COOH), and the like.Exemplary tridentate carboxylates include, but are not limited to,citric acid (2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid,(HOOC)CH₂C(OH(COOH)CH₂(COOH), trimesic acid, and the like. Exemplaryazoles include, but are not limited to, 1,2,3-triazole(1H-1,2,3-triazole, C₂H₃N₃), pyrrodiazole (1H-1,2,4-triazole, C₂H₃N₃),and the like. Exemplary suitable neutral ligands included, but are notlimited to, piperazine and 4,4′-bipyridine.

In a preferred embodiment, 5-80% of the total metal ions present in themetal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosure in any of itsembodiments are zinc (II) ions, preferably 6-75%, preferably 7-70%,preferably 8-68%, preferably 10-66%, preferably 15-50%, preferably20-40% of the total metal ions present in the metal organic frameworkcatalyst of the present disclosure in any of its embodiments are zinc(II) ions. In a preferred embodiment, 20-95% of the total metal ionspresent in the metal organic framework catalyst of the presentdisclosure in any of its embodiments are not zinc (II) ions, preferably25-94%, preferably 30-92%, preferably 32-91%, preferably 34-90%,preferably 50-85%, preferably 60-80% of the total metal ions present inthe metal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosure in any ofits embodiments are not zinc (II) ions. In a preferred embodiment, thesecond metal ions are copper (II) ions and 60-95% of the total metalions present in the metal organic framework catalyst of the presentdisclosure in any of its embodiments are copper (II) ions, preferably65-94%, preferably 70-93%, preferably 75-92%, preferably 80-91%,preferably 85-90% of the total metal ions present in the metal organicframework catalyst of the present disclosure in any of its embodimentsare copper (II) ions. In a preferred embodiment, the second metal ionsare at least one selected from the group consisting of iron (II) ionsand cobalt (II) ions and 5-60% of the total metal ions present in themetal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosure in any of itsembodiments are at least one selected from the group consisting of iron(II) ions and cobalt (II) ions, preferably 10-55%, preferably 15-50%,preferably 20-45%, preferably 25-40%, preferably 30-38%, preferably32-36% of the total metal ions present in the metal organic frameworkcatalyst of the present disclosure in any of its embodiments are atleast one selected from the group consisting of iron (II) ions andcobalt (II) ions.

In a preferred embodiment, the ratio of zinc (II) ions to the additionalmetal ions is in the range of 0.01 to 5.0, preferably 0.02 to 4.0,preferably 0.04 to 3.5, preferably 0.06 to 3.0, preferably 0.08 to 2.5,preferably 0.1 to 2.0. In a preferred embodiment, the second metal ionsare copper (II) ions and the ratio of zinc (II) ions to copper (II) ionsis in the range of 0.01 to 1.0, preferably 0.02 to 0.9, preferably 0.03to 0.8, preferably 0.04 to 0.7, preferably 0.05 to 0.6, preferably 0.06to 0.5, preferably 0.07 to 0.4, preferably 0.08 to 0.3, preferably 0.09to 0.2, preferably 0.095 to 0.15, preferably 0.1 to 0.125. In apreferred embodiment, the second metal ions are at least one selectedfrom the group consisting of iron (II) ions and cobalt (II) ions and theratio of zinc (II) ions to the second metal ions is in the range of 0.5to 5.0, preferably 0.75 to 4.5, preferably 1.0 to 4.0, preferably 1.25to 3.5, preferably 1.5 to 3.0, preferably 1.75 to 2.5, preferably 1.8 to2.25, preferably 1.9 to 2.20.

In a preferred embodiment, the benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligandscomprise carboxylate groups, with each carboxylate groups forming acoordinative bond to the zinc (II) metal ions or the second metal ionsto form a coordination network in the form of porous polyhedral crystalsthat are isostructural to an HKUST-1 metal organic framework. As usedherein, isostructural refers to chemical compounds having similarchemical structures. As used herein, isomorphous when used in relationto crystal structures is essentially synonymous. Two crystals are saidto be isostructural if they have the same structure, but not necessarilythe same cell dimensions not the same chemical composition, and with a“comparable” variability in the atomic coordinates to that of the celldimensions and chemical composition. Isostructural may further refer toisostructural series of isostructural polymorphs or isostructural phasetransitions. Many minerals are isostructural when they differ only inthe nature of a cation. The term isotypic may be used as synonymous withisostructural. For example, borazine is isostructural with benzene,indium (I) bromide is isostructural with β-thallium (I) iodide, andI-Gold (I) bromide is isostructural with gold (I) chloride.Additionally, isostnructural may further refer to compounds which areisoelectronic which usually have similar chemical structures, such as,for example methane, CH₄, and the ammonium ion, NH₄ ⁺, which are bothisoelectric and isostructural as both have a tetrahedral structure, theC—H and N—H bond lengths are different and crystal structures aredifferent.

In a preferred embodiment, the metal organic framework forms a highlyporous metal-coordination polymer [M₃(BTC)₂(H₂O)₃]_(n) (wherein BTC isbenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate and M is zinc (II) and/or the second metal,preferably iron (II), copper (II), and cobalt (II)0 which hasinterconnected [M₂(O₂CR)₄] units, C₁₈H₁₂O₁₅M₃(wherein R is an aromaticring). Preferably, this creates a 3-dimensional system of channels witha pore size of 0.2-2.0 nm, preferably 0.3-1.9 nm, preferably 0.4-1.8 nm,preferably 0.5-1.7 nm, preferably 0.6-1.8 nm, preferably 0.7-1.6 nm,preferably 0.8-1.5 nm, preferably 0.9-1.4 nm, preferably 1.0-1.3 nm,preferably 1.1-1.2 nm and an accessible porosity of greater than 30% inthe solid. The polymer framework is composed of dimeric metallictetracarboxylate building units with a metal ion inter nuclearseparation of 2-3 Å, preferably 2.2-2.8 Å, preferably 2.4-2.7 Å,preferably 2.5-2.65 Å. The framework is preferably neutral because thetwelve carboxylate oxygens from the two BTC ligands bind to fourcoordination sites for each of the three M²⁺ ions of the formula unit.Hence teach metal atom completes its pseudo-octahedral coordinationsphere with the presence of axial aqua ligands opposite to the M-Mdimer. The tetracarboxylate unit provides a structural motif withpotential four-fold symmetry, and the trimesic acid provides athree-fold symmetry element. The origin of the nano-challels can beconsidered to arise from the formation of larger octahedral secondarybuilding units (SBUs). Preferably, the main SBU in the metal organicframework catalyst of the present disclosure is the octahedral unit withM₂ at its 6 vertices and 4 trimesate ions tetrahedrally disposed as“panels” for four of the eight triangular faces of the octahedron. Theframework may be composed of an array of 32 M-M paddlewheels percrystallographic unit cell, connected in three dimensions by1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylate. This ligand arrangement results in twocoordinatively unsaturated M sites per paddlewheel which polar moleculescan interact with. The paddlewheels are preferably stable in both thecoordinatively saturated and unsaturated arrangements. It is possible toprepare the metal organic framework of the present disclosure thatcrystallizes with stoichiometric amounts of water coordinated to eachM²⁺ ion. Anhydrous (or “activated”) metal organic framework catalystwhere the axial aqua ligands are removed giving unsaturated metal sitesby gentle heating under low pressure and or by soaking in a polar proticsolvent or non-polar solvent, preferably dichloromethane or methanolresulting in the chemically activated metal organic framework catalystwith exposed M²⁺ sites.

In certain embodiments, the metal organic framework of the presentdisclosure may be considered a Lewis acid solid or to possess Lewischaracter, especially at the metal sites M²⁺ of the trinuclear networks.The structure of such metal organic frameworks is composed of thesecondary building unit with tetracoordinate metal centers in axialposition of easy access offering a high concentration of Lewis acidicsites and M²⁺ ions that are exposed ont eh surface of the framework andmight serve as potent Lewis acids. As used herein, a Lewis acid catalystor Lewis acid catalysis refers to organic reactions wherein ametal-based Lewis acid acts as an electron pair acceptor to increase thereactivity of a substrate. Common Lewis acid catalyst are based on maingroup metals including, but not limited to, aluminum, boron, silicon,and tin, as well as many early (i.e. titanium, zirconium) and late (i.e.iron, copper, zinc) d-block metals. Generally, the metal atom forms anadduct with a lone-pair bearing electronegative atom in the substratesuch as oxygen (both sp² or sp³), nitrogen, sulfur, and/or halogens. Thecomplexation generally has partial charge-transfer character and makesthe lone-pair donor effectively more electronegative, activating thesubstrate toward nucleophilic attack, heterocyclic bond cleavage, orcycloaddition. Many reactions, such as for example, selective oxidation,involving carbon-carbon or carbon-heteroatom bond formation can becatalyzed by Lewis acids.

In a preferred embodiment, the metal organic framework of the presentdisclosure forms porous polyhedral crystals, the polyhedral crystals arepreferably octahedral or cubic in shape with an average diameter orlongest linear dimension of 2-20 μm, preferably 4-18 μm, preferably 6-16μm, preferably 8-14 μm, preferably 9-13 μm, preferably 10-12 μm,preferably 11.1-11.9 μm.

In crystallography, crystal structure is a description of the orderedarrangement of atoms, ions or molecules in a crystalline material.Ordered structures occur from the intrinsic nature of the constituentparticles to form symmetric patterns that repeat along the principaldirections of three dimensional space in matter. The smallest group ofparticles in the material that constitutes the repeating pattern is theunit cell of the structure. The unit cell completely defines thesymmetry and structure of the entire crystal lattice, which is built upby repetitive translation of the unit cell along its principal axes. Therepeating pattern is said to be located at the points of the Bravaislattice. The lengths of the principal axes, or edges, of the unit celland the angles between them are the lattice constants, or latticeparameters, the symmetry properties of the crystal are described by theconcept of space groups. The crystal structure and symmetry play acritical role in determining many physical properties. Subunits of metalorganic frameworks, termed secondary building units (SBU) can bedescribed by topologies common to several structures. Each topology,also called a net, is assigned a symbol, consisting of three lower-caseletters. In a preferred embodiment, the metal organic framework catalystof the present disclosure in any of its embodiments crystallizes with astructural topology referred to as the tbo type in space group Fm3mwhich relates to “twisted” boracite.

The crystal structure of a material (the arrangement of atoms within agiven type of crystal) can be described in terms of its unit cell. Theunit cell is a box containing one or more atoms arranged in threedimensions. The unit cells stacked in three dimensional space describethe bulk arrangement of atoms of the crystal. The unit cell isrepresented in terms of its lattice parameters, which are the lengths ofthe cell edges (a, b, and c) and the angles between them (alpha, betaand gamma), while the positions of the atoms inside the unit cell aredescribed by the set of atomic positions (x_(i), y_(i), z_(i)) measuredfrom a reference lattice point. Commonly atomic positions arerepresented in terms of fractional coordinates, relative to the unitcell lengths. In a preferred embodiment, the metal organic frameworkcatalyst of the present disclosure in any of its embodiments has alarger unit cell dimension a (length of cell edge) than the HKUST-1metal organic framework, preferably at least a 0.025 Å larger unit celldimension α, preferably at least 0.05 Å larger, preferably at least0.075 Å larger, preferably at least 0.10 Å larger, preferably at least0.125 Å larger, preferably at least 0.15 Å larger, preferably at least0.175 Å larger, preferably at least 0.2 Å larger, preferably at least0.25 Å larger, preferably at least 0.3 Å larger unit cell dimension α.

Porosity is defined as the percentage of void space in a solid. As usedherein, porous materials are those where the void space is deliberatelyintroduced to fulfill certain functions. Total porosity (volume fractionof pores) is defined as ϕ=1−ρ_(r), where ρ_(r)=ρ/ρ₀ and is the relativedensity of the solid phase matrix or skeleton (ρ=bulk density andρ₀=theoretical density). It is expressed as a percentage of thetheoretical density (TD) of the solid as a whole. In a preferredembodiment, the metal organic framework catalyst of the presentdisclosure has a percent porosity of at least 30%, preferably at least35%, preferably at least 40%, preferably at least 45%, preferably atleast 50%, preferably at least 55%, preferably at least 60%, preferablyat least 65%, preferably at least 70%.

In a preferred embodiment, the metal organic framework catalyst of thepresent disclosure in any of its embodiments forms porous polyhedralcrystals having pores with an average diameter or aperture of 0.2-2.0nm, preferably 0.3-1.9 nm, preferably 0.4-1.8 nm, preferably 0.5-1.7 nm,preferably 0.6-1.8 nm, preferably 0.7-1.6 nm, preferably 0.8-1.5 nm,preferably 0.9-1.4 nm, preferably 1.0-1.3 nm, preferably 1.1-1.2 nm. Incertain embodiments, the metal organic framework catalyst of the presentdisclosure features three distinct internal pores, two of comparablesize (0.8-1.6 nm, preferably 0.9-1.4 nm) and a smaller pore (0.2-1.4 nm,preferably 0.8-1.2 nm, or about). One of the two larger pores preferablyfeatures metal ion bonds to metal ions (M-M) directed into the pores. Incertain embodiments, the metal organic framework may comprise squareshaped pores of 0.2-2.0 nm by 0.2-2.0 nm.

As used herein, bulk density is a property of powders, granules andother “divided” solids, especially used in reference to mineralcomponents and chemical substances or any other masses of corpuscular orparticulate matter. It is defined as the weight of many particles of thematerial divided by the total volume they occupy. The total volumeincludes particle volume, inter-particle void volume, and internal porevolume. In a preferred embodiment, the metal organic framework of thepresent disclosure in any of its embodiments has a bulk density of0.1-1.0 g/cm³, preferably 0.15-0.8 g/cm³, preferably 0.2-0.6 g/cm³,preferably 0.25-0.4 g/cm³, preferably 0.3-0.35 g/cm³.

The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) theory aims to explain the physicaladsorption of gas molecules on a solid surface and serves as the basisfor an important analysis technique for the measurement of the specificsurface area of a material. Specific surface area is a property ofsolids which is the total surface area of a material per unit of mass,solid or bulk volume, or cross sectional area. In a preferred embodimentthe metal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosure in any ofits embodiments has a BET surface area in the range of 500-3000 m²/g,preferably 750-2500 m²/g, preferably 1000-2000 m²/g, preferably1250-1750 m²/g, preferably 1400-1600 m²/g, or about 1500 m²/g.

According to a second aspect, the present disclosure relates to aprocess for producing the metal organic framework in any of itsembodiments comprising i) reacting 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid witha zinc (II) salt or hydrate in a solvent at a temperature greater than25° C. to form a zinc modified metal organic framework and ii)transmetallating at least a portion of the zinc modified metal organicframework by immersing in a solution of a salt or hydrate of the secondmetal ions.

The physicochemical characteristics of metal organic frameworks can bemodulated and many of these properties can be modified in the materialfrom the synthesis process. In a preferred embodiment, the metal organicframework of the present disclosure is produced by a solvothermalmethod. Typically the solvothermal synthesis comprises the reaction ofone or more metal salts and one or more organic ligands in the presenceof preferably organic solvents or mixtures, preferably involvingformamide, alcohols, or pyrrolidones. Important parameters in thesolvothermal synthesis include, but are not limited to, temperature,concentration of reactants (which can be varied over a wide range) andpH of the reaction solution. It is equally envisaged that the presentprocess in any of its embodiments may be adapted to produce the metalorganic framework of the present disclosure in any of its embodiments byother methods of synthesis which may be used to tailor the properties ofthe metal organic framework. Exemplary suitable methods that may be usedin addition to or in lieu of a solvothermal method include, but are notlimited to, mechanochemical methods, electrochemistry methods, assistedsynthesis methods (i.e. by ultrasound or microwave), and subcriticalwater methods.

In one step of the process, 1,3,5-benzentricarboxylic acid is reactedwith a zinc (II) salt or hydrate in a solvent at a temperature greaterthan 25° C. to form a zinc modified metal organic framework.

As used herein, the term “solvent” refers to and includes, but is notlimited to, water (e.g. tap water, distilled water, deionized water,deionized distilled water), organic solvents, such as ethers (e.g.diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, 1,4-dioxane, tetrahydropyran, t-butylmethyl ether, cyclopentyl methyl ether, di-iso-propyl ether), glycolethers (e.g. 1,2-dimethoxyethane, diglyme, triglyme), alcohols (e.g.methanol, ethanol, trifluoroethanol, n-propanol, i-propanol, n-butanol,i-butanol, t-butanol, n-pentanol, i-pentanol, 2-methyl-2-butanol,2-trifluoromethyl-2-propanol, 2,3-dimethyl-2-butanol, 3-pentanol,3-methyl-3-pentanol, 2-methyl-3-pentanol, 2-methyl-2-pentanol,2,3-dimethyl-3-pentanol, 3-ethyl-3-pentanol, 2-methyl-2-hexanol,3-hexanol, cyclopropylmethanol, cyclopropanol, cyclobutanol,cyclopentanol, cyclohexanol), aromatic solvents (e.g. benzene, o-xylene,m-xylene, p-xylene, mixtures of xylenes, toluene, mesitylene, anisole,1,2-dimethoxybenzene, α,α,α-trifluoromethylbenzene, fluorobenzene),chlorinated solvents (e.g. chlorobenzene, dichloromethane,1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethane, chloroform), ester solvents(e.g. ethyl acetate, propyl acetate), amide solvents (e.g.dimethylformamide, dimethylacetamide, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone), ureasolvents, ketones (e.g. acetone, butanone), acetonitrile, propionitrile,butyronitrile, benzonitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene carbonate,propylene carbonate, 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone,and mixtures thereof. As used herein solvent may refer to non-polarsolvents (e.g. hexane, benzene, toluene, diethyl ether, chloroform,1,4-dioxane), polar aprotic solvents (e.g. ethyl acetate,tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, acetone, acetonitrile,dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide) and polar protic solvents (e.g.acetic acid, n-butanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, ethanol, methanol,formic acid, water) and mixtures thereof.

In a preferred embodiment, the reacting is performed in a non-polarsolvent. Exemplary suitable non-polar solvents include, but are notlimited to, pentane, cyclopentane, hexane, cyclohexane, benzene,toluene, 1,4-dioxane, chloroform, diethyl ether, dichloromethane andmixtures thereof, preferably the solvent is dichloromethane. It isequally envisaged that the present process may be adapted to incorporatepolar protic solvent including, but not limited to, formic acid,n-butanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, ethanol, methanol, acetic acid, andwater, as well as polar aprotic solvents including, but not limited to,tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, acetone, dimethylformamide,acetonitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide, nitromethane, propylene carbonate andmixtures thereof.

As used herein, a salt refers to an ionic compound resulting from theneutralization reaction of an acid and a base. Salts are composed ofrelated numbers of cations (positively charged ions) and anions(negative ions) such that the product is electrically neutral (without anet charge). These component ions can be inorganic (i.e. chloride, Cl⁻)or organic (i.e. acetate, CH₃CO₂ ⁻) and can be monoatomic (i.e.fluoride, F⁻) or polyatomic (i.e. sulfate, SO₄ ²⁻). Exemplaryconventional salts include, but are not limited to, those derived frominorganic acids including, but not limited to, hydrochloric,hydrobromic, sulfuric, sulfamic, phosphoric, and nitric; and thosederived from organic acids including, but not limited to, acetic,propionic, succinic, glycolic, stearic, lactic, malic, tartaric, citric,ascorbic, pamoic, maleic, hydroxymaleic, phenylacetic, glutamic,benzoic, salicyclic, sulfanilic, 2-acetoxybenzoic, fumaric,toluenesulfonic, methanesulfonic, ethane disulfonic, oxalic, isethionic,and mixtures thereof and the like.

As used herein, a solvate refers to a physical association of a compoundwith one or more solvent molecules, whether organic or inorganic,preferably water in a hydrate. This physical association may includehydrogen bonding. In certain instances the solvent molecules may beincorporated in the crystal lattice of the crystalline solid. Thesolvent molecules may be present in a regular arrangement and/or anon-ordered arrangement. The solvate may comprise either astoichiometric or nonstoichiometric amount of the solvent molecules.Solvate encompasses both solution phase and isolable solvates. As usedherein, a hydrate is a substance that contains water or its constituentelements. The chemical state of the water varies widely betweendifferent classes of hydrates. In organic chemistry, a hydrate is acompound formed by the addition of water or its elements to anothermolecule. Many organic molecules, as well as inorganic molecules, formcrystals that incorporate water into the crystalline structure withoutchemical alteration of the organic molecule. In inorganic chemistry,hydrates are inorganic salts containing water molecules combined in adefinite ratio as an integral part of the crystal that are either boundto a metal center or that have crystallized with the metal complex. Thenotation of a hydrated compound (n-H₂O) where n is a number of watermolecules per formula unit of the salt is commonly used to show that asalt is hydrated. The n is usually a low integer, though it is possiblefor fractional values to occur.

Exemplary zinc salts or hydrates include, but are not limited to, zincnitrate (Zn(NO₃)2), zinc chlorate Zn(ClO₃)₂, zinc sulfate (ZnSO₄), zincphosphate (Zn₃(PO₄)2) zinc molybdate (ZnMoO₄), zinc chromate (ZnCrO₄),zinc arsenite (Zn(AsO₂)₂), zinc arsenate octahydrate (Zn(AsO₄)₂.8H₂O),zinc acetate (Zn(O₂CCH₃)₂), zinc bromide, zinc bromide dehydrate, zincchloride, zinc citrate dihydrate, zinc cyanide, zinc fluoride, zinchexafluorosilicate, zinc iodide, zinc methacrylate, zinc nitratehydrate, zinc oxalate hydrate, zinc perchlorate hexahydrate, zincselenite, zinc sulfate heptahydrate, zinc tetrafluoroborate hydrate,zinc p-toluenesulfonate hydrate, and the like. In a preferredembodiment, the zinc (II) salt or hydrate is Zn(NO₃)₂.6H₂O.

In a preferred embodiment, the zinc (II) salt or hydrate is the limitingreagent in the process. In certain embodiments, an amount of the zinc(II) salt or hydrate is in a range of 0.01-100 mmol, preferably 0.1-20mmol, preferably 0.15-10 mmol, preferably 0.175-5 mmol. In a preferredembodiment, the zinc (II) salt or hydrate is present at a concentrationof 0.001-10 M in the solvent of the reaction mixture, preferably0.01-5M, preferably 0.1-1 M in the solvent of the reaction mixture. In apreferred embodiment, the 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid may be presentin an excess of 1.5-20 molar equivalents of the zinc (II) salt orhydrate, preferably 2-15 molar equivalents, preferably 4-12 molarequivalents, preferably 6-10 molar equivalents of the zinc (II) salt orhydrate.

In a preferred embodiment the reacting may be performed at a temperatureof 25-140° C., preferably 40-120° C., preferably 45-110° C., preferably50-100° C., preferably 60-95° C., preferably 70-90° C., or about 85° C.In a preferred embodiment, the reacting may be performed for a timeperiod of 2-36 hours, preferably 4-30 hours, preferably 6-24 hours,preferably 8-20 hours, preferably 10-18 hours, preferably 12-16 hours.The zinc modified metal organic framework may be isolated and purifiedby methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art, such afiltration, decantation, aqueous work-up, extraction with organicsolvents, distillation, crystallization, column chromatography, and highpressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) on normal phase or reversed phase.

In a preferred embodiment, the obtained zinc modified metal organicframework crystals are washed or rinsed with a polar aprotic solvent,preferably dimethylformamide 1-10 times, preferably 2-5 times, or about3 times to obtain preferably colorless cubic crystals. In certainembodiments, the reacting may further comprise activating the zincmodified metal organic framework. As used herein, activation refers toremoval of axial aqua ligands from a metal organic framework, theactivation giving unsaturated metal sites without affecting the rigidframework of the metal organic framework. In a preferred embodiment, thezinc modified metal organic framework is activated by soaking in a polarprotic solvent or non-polar solvent, preferably dichloromethane ormethanol, most preferably methanol for 1-10 days, preferably 2-5 days,or about 3 days optionally with decanting and replenishment of freshsolvent. The obtained zinc modified metal organic framework may furtherbe dried under preferably reduced pressure (i.e. vacuum) at atemperature of 50-300° C., preferably 100-250° C., preferably 125-200°C., preferably 150-180° C.

In another step of the process, at least a portion of the zinc modifiedmetal organic framework is transmetallated by being immersed in asolution of a salt or hydrate of the second metal ions.

As used herein transmetallating or transmettalation refers to a type oforganometallic reaction that involves the transfer of ligands from onemetal to another. Generally the reaction is an irreversible process dueto thermodynamic and kinetic reasons. Thermodynamics will favor thereaction based on the electronegativities of the metals and kineticswill favor the reaction if there are empty orbitals on both metals. Interms of the present disclosure, the transmetallation may beredox-transmetallation and/or redox-transmetallation/ligand exchange,preferably redox-transmetallation/ligand exchange.

In a preferred embodiment, the second metal ions are at least oneselected from the group consisting of iron (II) ions, cobalt (II) ions,and copper (II) ions. Exemplary suitable salts or hydrates of the secondmetal ions include, but are not limited to, copper (II) bromide, copper(II) chloride, copper (II) chloride dihydrate, copper (II)cyclohexanbutyrate, copper (II) fluoride, copper (II) fluoride hydrate,copper (II) hydroxide, copper (II) hydroxide phosphate, copper (II)molybdate, copper (II) nitrate, copper (II) nitrate hemi(pentahydrate),copper (II) nitrate hydrate, copper (II) perchlorate, copper (II)pyrophosphate hydrate, copper (II) selenite dehydrate, copper (II)sulfate, copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate, copper (II) tartrate hydrate,copper (II) tetrafluoroborate hydrate, tetraamminecopper (II) sulfatemonohydrate, ammonium cobalt (II) sulfate hexahydrate, cobalt (II)bromide, cobalt (II) carbonate hydrate, cobalt (II) chloride, cobalt(II) chloride hydrated, cobalt (II) cyanide dehydrate, cobalt (II)fluoride, cobalt (II) fluoride tetrahydrate, cobalt (II) hydroxide,cobalt (II) iodide, cobalt (II) nitrate hexahydrate, cobalt (II) oxalatedehydrate, cobalt (II) perchlorate hexahydrate, cobalt (II) phosphatehydrate, cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate, cobalt (II) sulfate hydrate,cobalt (II) tetrafluoroborate hexahydrate, cobalt (II) thiocyanate,ammonium iron (II) sulfate hexahydrate, iron (II) bromide, iron (II)chloride, iron (II) chloride tetrahydrate, iron (II) fluoride, iron (II)iodide, iron (II) molybdate, iron (II) oxalate dehydrate, iron (II)perchlorate hydrate, iron (II) sulfate hydrate, iron (II)tetrafluoroborate hexahydrate, potassium hexacyanoferrate (II)trihydrate, and the like. In a preferred embodiment, the salt or hydrateof the second metal ions is at least one selected from the groupconsisting of Cu(NO₃)₂.3H₂O, Co(NO₃)₂.6H₂O, and FeCl₂.6H₂O.

In a preferred embodiment, the zinc modified metal organic framework isthe limiting reagent and is immersed in a 0.01-10 M solution of a saltor hydrate of the second metal ions, preferably 0.05-5.0 M, preferably0.1-1.0 M, preferably 0.25-0.75 M solution of a salt or hydrate of thesecond metal ions. In a preferred embodiment the immersion is performedat a temperature of 10-100° C., preferably 20-80° C., preferably 25-70°C., preferably 30-60° C., preferably 35-50° C., or about 40° C. In apreferred embodiment the immersion is performed for a time period of1-120 hours, preferably 12-96 hours, preferably 24-84 hours, preferably36-78 hours, preferably 48-72 hours. In a preferred embodiment, thesolution of a salt or hydrate of the second metal ions comprises a polarprotic solvent or non-polar solvent, preferably dichloromethane ormethanol, most preferably methanol as a solvent. The thereby obtainedmetal organic framework catalyst may be isolated and purified by methodsknown to those of ordinary skill in the art, such a filtration,decantation, aqueous work-up, extraction with organic solvents,distillation, crystallization, column chromatography, and high pressureliquid chromatography (HPLC) on normal phase or reversed phase.

In a preferred embodiment, the obtained metal organic framework catalystcrystals are washed or rinsed with a polar protic solvent, preferablymethanol. In certain embodiments, the transmetallating may furthercomprise activating the metal organic framework catalyst. In a preferredembodiment, the metal organic framework catalyst is activated or washedfor remove any residual metal ions by soaking in a polar protic solventor non-polar solvent, preferably dichloromethane or methanol, mostpreferably methanol. The obtained cation-exchanged metal organicframework may further be dried under preferably reduced pressure (i.e.vacuum) at a temperature of 10-100° C., preferably 15-80° C., preferably20-60° C., preferably 25-40° C.

According to a third aspect, the present disclosure relates to a methodfor an oxidation of a cyclic hydrocarbon comprising contacting thecyclic hydrocarbon with the metal organic framework catalyst of thepresent disclosure in any of its embodiments in the presence of asolvent and an oxidizing agent to form an oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon.

As used herein, oxidation refers to the loss of electrons or theincrease in oxidation state by a molecule, atom, or ion (i.e. the cyclichydrocarbon). Redox (short for reduction-oxidation reaction) is achemical reaction in which the oxidation states of atoms are changed.Any such reaction involves both a reduction process and a complimentaryoxidation process, two key concepts involved with electron transferprocesses. Redox reactions include all chemical reactions in which atomshave their oxidation state changed; in general, redox reactions involvethe transfer of electrons between chemical species. The chemical speciesfrom which the electron is stripped is said to have been oxidized, whilethe chemical species to which the electron is added is said to have beenreduced. The processes of oxidation and reduction occur simultaneouslyand cannot happen independently of one another. Although oxidation andreduction properly refer to change in oxidation state, the actualtransfer of electrons may not actually occur. The oxidation state of anatom refers to the fictitious change that an atom would have if allbonds between atoms of different elements were 100% ionic. Thus,oxidation can best be defined as an increase in oxidation, and reductionas a decrease in oxidation state. In practice, the transfer of electronswill always cause a change in oxidation state; however, many reactionsmay be classified as redox even though no electron transfer occurs (i.e.those involving covalent bonds). As used herein, catalytic oxidationsare processes that oxidize compounds using catalysts.

In terms of the present disclosure, the oxidations may be classifiedinto groups depending on the type of bond change involved. These groupsmay include, but are not limited to, eliminations of hydrogen, reactionsinvolving cleavage of carbon-carbon bonds, reaction involvingreplacement of hydrogen by oxygen, reactions in which oxygen is added tothe substrate, and oxidative coupling, preferably reactions involvingreplacement of hydrogen by oxygen. In inorganic chemistry, where ionicbonds are common, an oxidation may be defined as the loss of one or moreelectrons by an atom. In organic chemistry, however, where polarcovalent bonds are common, an oxidation is a reaction that results in aloss of electron density by carbon. This loss is usually caused eitherby bond formation between carbon and a more electronegative atom(usually oxygen, nitrogen, or a halogen) or by bond breaking betweencarbon and a less electronegative atom (usually hydrogen). Thus,oxidation refers to a decrease of electron density of carbon by formingfor example C—O, C—N, and/or C—X bonds or breaking C—H bonds.

The practice in organic chemistry is to designate a series of functionalgroups, in a qualitative way, arranged in order of increasing oxidationstate, and then to define an oxidation as a conversion of a functionalgroup in a molecule from one category to another. Alkanes are at thelowest oxidation level in that they have the maximum possible number ofC—H bonds, and CO₂ is at the highest level because it has the maximumpossible number of C—O bonds. As used herein, any reaction that convertsa compound from a lower level to a higher level is an oxidation. It isnoted that this classification applies generally to only a single carbonatom or two adjacent carbon atoms. For example, CH₃CH₃ or RH can bethought to have a low oxidation state (˜−4), H₂C═CH₂ or —C═C—, CH₃OH orROH, CH₃Cl or RCl, and CH₃NH₂ or RNH₂ can be thought to have anincreased oxidation state (˜−2), HC≡CH or —C≡C—, H₂C═O or R₁R₂C═O,CH₂Cl₂ or R₁R₂CCl₂, H₂C═NH, and HO—C—C—OH can be thought to have afurther increased oxidation state (˜0), HCO₂H or RCOOH, CHCl₃ or CRCl₃,HC≡N or RC≡N and RCONH₂ can be thought to have an even further increasedoxidation state (˜+2), and CO₂ and CCl₄ can be though to have a highestoxidation state (˜+4). As used herein, oxidation refers to loss of bondsto a hydrogen atom and/or gain of bonds to a more electronegativeelement such as oxygen, nitrogen, and/or the halogens, preferablyoxygen. In a preferred embodiment, the oxidation is a transition of aCH₃ group to a HC═O or COOH group, or a CH₂ group to a HC—OH or C═Ogroup, or a CH group to a C—OH group.

As used herein, a hydrocarbon is an organic compound consisting entirelyof hydrogen and carbon and which are thus group 14 hydrides.Hydrocarbons from which one hydrogen atom has been removed arefunctional groups referred to as hydrocarbyls. Aromatic hydrocarbons(arenes), alkanes, alkenes, cycloalkanes and alkyne-based compounds aredifferent types of hydrocarbons. As used herein a cyclic compound (ringcompound) is a term for a compound in the field of chemistry in whichone or more series of atoms in the compound is connected to form a ring.Rings may vary in size from three to many atoms, and preferably refer toexamples where all the ring atoms are carbon (i.e. are carbocycles).Depending on the ring size, the bond order of the individual linksbetween ring atoms, and their arrangement within the rings the cyclichydrocarbon may be aromatic or aliphatic (non-aromatic). In terms of thepresent disclosure, the cyclic hydrocarbon may be aromatic or aliphatic.

In certain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon is an alicyclic compoundor carbocycle. As used herein an alicyclic compound is an organiccompound that is both aliphatic and cyclic. They may contain one or moreall-carbon rings which may be either saturated or unsaturated, but donot have aromatic character. Alicyclic compounds may have one or morealiphatic side chains attached, such as for example, methylcyclohexane.In certain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon may be a simple alicycliccompound such as a monocyclic cycloalkane. Exemplary suitable monocycliccycloalkanes include, but are not limited to, cyclopropane, cyclobutane,cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, cyclotridecane,and the like, preferably cyclohexane. In certain embodiments, the cyclichydrocarbon may be a bicyclic or polycyclic alkane. Exemplary bicyclicor polycyclic alkanes include, but are not limited to, bicycloundecane,norbornane, decalin, cubane, basketane, housane, and the like. Incertain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon may be a spiro compound. Asused herein, spiro compounds have two or more rings that are connectedthrough only one carbon atom. In certain embodiments, the cyclichydrocarbon may be a monocyclic cycloalkene (cycloolefin) or bicycliccycloalkene. Exemplary monocyclic or bicyclic cycloalkenes include, butare not limited to, cyclopropene, cyclobutene, cyclopentene,cyclohexene, cycloheptene, cyclooctene, 1,3-cyclohexadiene,1,4-cyclohexadiene, 1,5-cyclooctadiene, norbornene, norbornadiene,methylenecyclohexane, 1-methylcyclohexene, and the like. In certainembodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon may comprise one or more exocyclicdouble bonds, such as for example, the isotoluenes.

In certain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon is an aromatichydrocarbon or arene. As used herein, an aromatic hydrocarbon or areneis a hydrocarbon with sigma bonds and delocalized pi electrons betweencarbon atoms forming a circle. In contrast, aliphatic hydrocarbons lackthis delocalization. The configuration of six carbon atoms in aromaticcompounds is known as a benzene ring, after the simplest possible suchhydrocarbon, benzene. In terms of the present disclosure, the aromatichydrocarbon may be monocyclic (MAH) or polycyclic (PAH). In certainembodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon is benzene or a benzene derivative.As used herein, benzene derivatives refer to from one to sixsubstituents attached to a central benzene core. Exemplary suitablebenzene derivatives include, but are not limited to, toluene,ethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene, p-xylene, mixed xylenes, mesitylene,durene, 2-phenylhexane, biphenyl, and the like, preferably toluene.

In certain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon is a polycyclic aromatichydrocarbon (PAH). As used herein a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon isan aromatic hydrocarbon that consists of fused aromatic rings and doesnot contain heteroatoms or carry substituents. Exemplary suitablepolycyclic hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, naphthalene,naphthenes, anthracene, phenathrene, tetracene, chrysene, triphenylene,pyrene, pentacene, benzo[a]pyrene, corannulene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene,coronene, ovalene, benzo[c]fluorene, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene,benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[j]fluoranthene,benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[e]pyrene, cyclopenta[c,d]pyrene,dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzo[a,e]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]pyrene,dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, fluoroanthene, fluorene,indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene, 5-methylchrysene and the like.

It is equally envisaged that the method of the present disclosure may beadapted to additional optionally substituted alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, orheterocyclic substrates or similar moieties of larger and/or morecomplex compounds.

As used herein, the term “substituted” refers to at least one hydrogenatom that is replaced with a non-hydrogen group, provided that normalvalencies are maintained and that the substitution results in a stablecompound. When a compound or substituent (—R group denoted as R₁, R₂, R₃and so forth) is noted as “optionally substituted”, the substituents areselected from the exemplary group including, but not limited to, halo,hydroxyl, alkoxy, oxo, alkanoyl, aryloxy, alkanoyloxy, amino,alkylamino, arylamino, arylalkylamino, disubstituted amines (e.g. inwhich the two amino substituents are selected from the exemplary groupincluding, but not limited to, alkyl, aryl or arylalkyl), alkanylamino,aroylamino, aralkanoylamino, substituted alkanoylamino, substitutedarylamino, substituted aralkanoyl amino, thiol, alkylthio, arylthio,arylalkylthio, alkylthiono, arylthiono, aryalkylthiono, alkylsulfonyl,arylsulfonyl, arylalkylsulfonyl, sulfonamide (e.g. —SO₂NH₂), substitutedsulfonamide, nitro, cyano, carboxy, carbamyl (e.g. —CONH₂), substitutedcarbamyl (e.g. —CONHalkyl, —CONHaryl, —CONHarylalkyl or cases wherethere are two substituents on one nitrogen from alkyl, aryl, oralkylalkyl), alkoxycarbonyl, aryl, substituted aryl, guanidine,heterocyclyl (e.g. indolyl, imidazoyl, furyl, thienyl, thiazolyl,pyrrolidyl, pyridyl, pyrimidiyl, pyrrolidinyl, piperidinyl, morpholinyl,piperazinyl, homopiperazinyl and the like), substituted heterocyclyl andmixtures thereof and the like. The substituted moiety may be eitherprotected or unprotected as necessary, and as known to those skilled inthe art.

As used herein, the term “alkyl” unless otherwise specified refers toboth branched and straight chain saturated aliphatic primary, secondary,and/or tertiary hydrocarbons or hydrocarbon fragments of typically C₁ toC₁₀, and specifically includes, but is not limited to, methyl,trifluoromethyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, cyclopropyl, butyl, isobutyl,t-butyl, pentyl, cyclopentyl, isopentyl, neopentyl, hexyl, isohexyl,cyclohexyl, cyclohexylmethyl, 3-methylpentyl, 2,2-dimethylbutyl, and2,3-dimethylbutyl. As used herein, the term optionally includessubstituted alkyl groups. Exemplary moieties with which the alkyl groupcan be substituted may be selected from the group including, but notlimited to, hydroxyl, amino, alkylamino, arylamino, alkoxy, aryloxy,nitro, cyano, sulfonic acid, sulfate, phosphonic acid, phosphate, orphosphonate or mixtures thereof. The substituted moiety may be eitherprotected or unprotected as necessary, and as known to those skilled inthe art.

As used herein, the term “cycloalkyl” refers to cyclized alkyl groups.Exemplary cycloalkyl groups include, but are not limited to,cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, norbornyl, andadamantyl. Branched cycloalkyl groups such as exemplary1-methylcyclopropyl and 2-methylcyclopropyl groups are included in thedefinition of cycloalkyl as used in the present disclosure.

As used herein, the term “aryl” unless otherwise specified refers tofunctional groups or substituents derived from an aromatic ringincluding, but not limited to, phenyl, biphenyl, napthyl, thienyl, andindolyl. As used herein, the term optionally includes both substitutedand unsubstituted moieties. Exemplary moieties with which the aryl groupcan be substituted may be selected from the group including, but notlimited to, hydroxyl, amino, alkylamino, arylamino, alkoxy, aryloxy,nitro, cyano, sulfonic acid, sulfate, phosphonic acid, phosphate orphosphonate or mixtures thereof. The substituted moiety may be eitherprotected or unprotected as necessary, and as known to those skilled inthe art.

As used herein, the term “heterocyclyl” unless otherwise specifiedrefers to a 3-8, preferably 4-8, more preferably 4-7 membered monocyclicring or a fused 8-12 membered bicyclic ring which may be saturated orpartially unsaturated, which monocyclic or bicyclic ring contains 1 to 4heteroatoms selected from oxygen, nitrogen, silicon or sulfur. Examplesof such monocyclic rings include oxaziridinyl, homopiperazinyl,oxiranyl, dioxiranyl, aziridinyl, pyrrolidinyl, azetidinyl,pyrazolidinyl, oxazolidinyl, piperidinyl, piperazinyl, morpholinyl,thiomorpholinyl, thiazolidinyl, hydantoinyl, valerolactamyl, oxiranyl,oxetanyl, dioxolanyl, dioxanyl, oxathiolanyl, oxathianyl, dithianyl,dihydrofuranyl, tetrahydrofuranyl, dihydropyranyl, tetrahydropyranyl,tetrahydropyridyl, tetrahydropyrimidinyl, tetrahydrothiophenyl,tetrahydrothiopyranyl, diazepanyl and azepanyl. Examples of suchbicyclic rings include indolinyl, isoindolinyl, benzopyranyl,quinuclidinyl, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,3,benzazepine,4-(benzo-1,3,dioxol-5-methyl)piperazine, and tetrahydroisoquinolinyl.Further, “substituted heterocyclyl” may refer to a heterocyclyl ringwhich has one or more oxygen atoms bonded to the ring (i.e. as ringatoms). Preferably, said atom which is bonded to the ring selected fromnitrogen or sulphur. An example of a heterocyclyl substituted with oneor more oxygen atoms is 1,1-dioxido-1,3-thiazolidinyl.

The general nature of the cyclic hydrocarbon substrate is not viewed asparticularly limiting to the oxidation process described herein in anyof its embodiments. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon isat least one selected from the group consisting of toluene, cyclohexane,and methylcyclohexane.

As used herein, an oxidizing agent (oxidant, oxidizer) refers to asubstance that has the ability to oxidize other substances (i.e. causethem to lose electrons). Substances that have the ability to oxidizeother substances (cause them to lose electrons) are said to be oxidativeor oxidizing and are known as oxidizing agents, oxidants, or oxidizers.That is, the oxidant (oxidizing agent) removes electrons from anothersubstance, and is thus itself reduced. Because it “accepts” electrons,the oxidizing agent may also be called an electron acceptor. Oxygen is aquintessential oxidizer. Common oxidizing agents include, but are notlimited to, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, and the halogens. Oxidants areusually chemical substances with elements in high oxidation states (e.g.H₂O₂, MnO₄ ⁻, CrO₃, Cr₂O₇ ²⁻, OsO₄) or else highly electronegativeelements (O₂, F₂, Cl₂, Br₂) that can gain extra electrons by oxidizinganother substance. In one sense, an oxidizing agent is a chemicalspecies that undergoes a chemical reaction that removes one or moreelectrons from another atom. In that sense, it is one component in anoxidation-reduction (redox) reaction. In another sense, an oxidizingagent is a chemical species that transfers electronegative atoms,usually oxygen, to a substrate. Combustion, many explosives, and organicredox reactions typically involve atom-transfer reactions.

In certain embodiments, the oxidizing agent may be an electron acceptor.Electron acceptors participate in electron-transfer reactions. In thiscontext, the oxidizing agent is called an electron acceptor and thereducing agent is called an electron donor. Extensive tabulations andrankings of the electron accepting properties of various reagents (redoxpotentials) are available. The mechanism and details of the electrontransfer event can be described as inner sphere or outer sphere.Exemplary electron acceptor oxidizing agents include, but are notlimited to, tetracyanoquinodimethane, the ferrocenium ion Fe(C₅H₅)²⁺,which accepts an electron to form Fe(C₅H₅)₂, the radical cation derivedfrom N(C₆H₄-4-Br)₃ (“Magic blue”), and the like.

In a preferred embodiment, the oxidizing agent is an atom-transferreagent. Commonly, an oxidizing agent as an atom-transfer reagenttransfers oxygen atoms to a substrate. In this context, the oxidizingagent can be termed an oxygenation reagent or an oxygen-atom transfer(OAT) agent. Exemplary oxygen-atom transfer agents include, but are notlimited to, MnO⁴⁻ (permanganate), CrO₄ ²⁻ (chromate), OsO₄ (osmiumtetroxide), and ClO⁴⁻ (perchlorate). In some instances, these oxidespecies can also serve as electron acceptors, as illustrated by theconversion of MnO₄ ⁻ to MnO₄ ²⁻, manganite. In a preferred embodiment,the oxidizing agent is an oxygen-atom transfer agent. Exemplary suitableoxygen-atom transfer agent oxidizing agents include, but are not limitedto, oxygen (O₂), ozone (O₃), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), tert-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP) and other inorganic peroxides, Fenton's reagent,fluorine (F₂), chlorine (Cl₂), bromine (Br₂), iodine (I₂) and otherhalogens, nitric acid (HNO₃) and nitrate compounds, sulfuric acid(H₂SO₄), peroxydisulfuric acid (H₂S₂O₈), peroxymonosulfuric acid(H₂SO₅), chlorite, chlorate (ClO₃ ⁻), perchlorate and other analogoushalogen compounds, hypochlorite (ClO⁻) and other hypohalite compounds,sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) hexavalent chromium compounds (i.e. chromicand dichromic acids and chromium trioxide (CrO₃), pyridiniumchlorochromate (PCC) and chromate/dichromate (CrO₄ ²⁻/Cr₂O₇ ²⁻)compounds), permanganate compounds (i.e. potassium permanganate), sodiumperborate, nitrous oxide (N₂O), potassium nitrate (KNO₃), sodiumbismuthate, sulfur dioxide (SO₂), and the like. In a most preferredembodiment, the oxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide.

In a preferred embodiment, the contacting and reacting is performed in apolar aprotic solvent. Exemplary suitable polar aprotic solventsinclude, but are not limited to, tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate,acetone, dimethylformamide, acetonitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide,nitromethane, propylene carbonate and mixtures thereof, preferably thesolvent is acetonitrile or dimethylformamide, most preferably thesolvent is acetonitrile. It is equally envisaged that the present methodmay be adapted to incorporate polar protic solvents including, but notlimited to, formic acid, n-butanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, ethanol,methanol, acetic acid, and water, as well as non-polar solventsincluding, but not limited to, pentane, cyclopentane, hexane,cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, 1,4-dioxane, chloroform, diethyl ether,dichloromethane, and mixtures thereof.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is the limitingreagent in the oxidation method. In certain embodiments, an amount ofthe cyclic hydrocarbon may be in a range of 0.1-100 mmol, preferably0.5-25 mmol, preferably 1.0-10 mmol, preferably 1.0-5 mmol. In apreferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is present at aconcentration of 0.01-20 M in the solvent of the reaction mixture,preferably 0.1-10 M, preferably 1.0-5.0 M in the solvent of the reactionmixture. In a preferred embodiment, the oxidizing agent may be presentin an excess of 1.1-50 molar equivalents of the cyclic hydrocarbon,preferably 2-40 molar equivalents, preferably 4-30 molar equivalents,preferably 5-20 molar equivalents of the cyclic hydrocarbon.

In a preferred embodiment, an amount of the metal organic frameworkcatalyst may range from 1-200 grams of catalyst per mole of the cyclichydrocarbon, preferably 5-150 g/mol, preferably 10-100 g/mol, preferably15-80 g/mol, preferably 20-75 grams of catalyst per mole of the cyclichydrocarbon. In certain embodiments, the amount of the metal organicframework catalyst may range from 0.001-10 mol % of a number of moles ofthe cyclic hydrocarbon, preferably 0.05-5 mol %, preferably 0.01-2 mol%, preferably 0.1-1.0 mol % of a number of moles of the cyclichydrocarbon, although higher catalyst loadings (e.g. up to 20 mol %, 30mol %, 40 mol %, 80 mol %) may be used and the method will still proceedas intended. In certain embodiments, the molar ratio of the cyclichydrocarbon to the metal organic framework catalyst is greater than 100,preferably greater than 200, preferably greater than 400, preferablygreater than 500.

In a preferred embodiment, the contacting may be performed at atemperature in the range of 40-100° C., preferably 45-95° C., preferably50-90° C., preferably 55-85° C., preferably 60-80° C., preferably 65-75°C., or about 70° C. An external heat source, such as a water bath or anoil bath, an oven, microwave, or a heating mantle, may be employed toheat the reaction mixture. In a preferred embodiment, the external heatsource is a thermostatted thermocirculator. In one embodiment, theaqueous solution is not heated with microwave irradiation. Preferably,the reacting is performed under air, preferably in a sealed container.In another embodiment, the reacting and contacting is performed in aninert atmosphere provided by an inert gas (i.e. nitrogen and/or argon).

In a preferred embodiment, the contacting and reacting may be performedfor a time period of 2-36 hours, preferably 4-30 hours, preferably 6-24hours, preferably 8-20 hours, preferably 10-18 hours, preferably 12-16hours. The reaction may be shaken/stirred throughout the duration of thecontacting and reacting by employing a rotary shaker, a magneticstirrer, or an overhead stirrer. In another embodiment, the reactionmixture is left to stand (i.e. not stirred). In one embodiment, thereaction mixture is preferably mixed in a centrifugal mixer with arotational speed of at least 200 rpm, preferably at least 500 rpm,preferably at least 800 rpm, preferably at least 1000 rpm, even thoughit may also be mixed with a spatula. In one embodiment, the reactionmixture is sonicated during the mixing.

The reaction mixture is preferably heterogeneous and comprises suspendedmetal organic framework catalyst particles in the liquid reactionmixture. In certain embodiments, the metal organic framework catalystparticles may be dispersed within the reaction mixture, and may furtherbe filtered, washed, reactivated, and/or recycled at the end of areaction iteration. In one embodiment, the metal organic frameworkcatalyst may be placed in a bag or semi-permeable membrane and the bagmay be immersed in the reaction mixture. Accordingly, the metal organicframework catalyst remains in the bag or semi-permeable membrane throughthe contacting and reaction until the oxidation is completed.Preferably, the membrane that is required for this technique shall alloweasy transportation of both reactants and products yet have a pore sizethat ensures retention of the metal organic framework catalyst. Incertain embodiments, the progress of each reaction iteration may bemonitored by methods well known to those of ordinary skill in the artincluding, but not limited to, thin layer chromatography, gaschromatography, nuclear magnetic resonance, infrared spectroscopy, andhigh pressure liquid chromatography combined with ultraviolet detectionor mass spectroscopy

The general nature of the cyclic hydrocarbon substrate is not viewed asparticularly limiting to the oxidation process described herein in anyof its embodiments. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon isat least one selected from the group consisting of toluene, cyclohexane,and methylcyclohexane. In certain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon istoluene and the formed oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon is at least oneselected from the group consisting of benzaldehyde, benzoic acid, benzylalcohol, and cresols (defined as mixed cresols or o,m,p-cresolsincluding o-cresol, m-cresol, and p-cresol), preferably benzaldehyde. Incertain embodiments, the cyclic hydrocarbon is cyclohexane and theformed oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon is at least one selected from thegroup consisting of cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol, 4-hydroxycyclohexanone,and 1,4-cyclohexadione, preferably cyclohexanone. In certain embodimentsthe cyclic hydrocarbon is methylcyclohexane and the formed oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon is at least one selected from the group consisting ofmethylcyclohexanol (defined as including 1-methylcyclohexan-1-ol,2-methylcyclohexan-1-ol, 3-methylcyclohexan-1-ol, and4-methylcyclohexan-1-ol), methylcyclohexanone (defined as including2-methylcyclohexan-1-one, 3-methylcyclohexan-1-one, and 4-methylcyclohexan-1-one), cyclohexanemethanol, cyclohexanal, and3-hepten-2-one, preferably methyl cyclohexanol or methylcyclohexanone.

The definitions used in calculating the conversion and selectivity ofthe cyclic hydrocarbon to one or more oxidized cyclic hydrocarbons arerepresented for the method of the present disclosure using the metalorganic framework catalyst in any of its embodiments are represented informula (I) and formula (II) respectively.

$\begin{matrix}{{{Conversion}\mspace{14mu}{of}\mspace{14mu}{cyclic}\mspace{14mu}{hydrcoarbon}} = {\frac{{Moles}\mspace{14mu}{of}\mspace{14mu}{cyclic}\mspace{14mu}{hydrocarbon}\mspace{14mu}{converted}}{{Moles}\mspace{14mu}{of}\mspace{14mu}{cyclic}\mspace{14mu}{hydrocarbon}\mspace{14mu}{fed}} \times 100\%}} & (I) \\{{{Selectivity}\mspace{14mu}{to}\mspace{14mu}{oxidized}\mspace{14mu}{product}{\mspace{11mu}\;}i} = {\frac{{{Moles}\mspace{14mu}{of}\mspace{14mu}{oxidized}\mspace{14mu}{product}\mspace{14mu} i}\mspace{14mu}}{{Moles}\mspace{14mu}{of}\mspace{14mu}{cyclic}\mspace{14mu}{hydrocarbon}\mspace{14mu}{converted}} \times 100\%}} & ({II})\end{matrix}$The conversion of cyclic hydrocarbon (i.e. toluene) (%) can be thoughtof as moles of cyclic hydrocarbon converted divided by moles of cyclichydrocarbon fed multiplied by 100% and the selectivity (i.e.benzaldehyde, benzoic acid, cresols) to oxidized cyclic hydrocarbonproduct can be thought of as moles of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbonproduct divided by the moles of cyclic hydrocarbon converted multipliedby 100%.

In a preferred embodiment, the percent conversion from the cyclichydrocarbon to oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products is greater than 15%,preferably greater than 20%, preferably greater than 25%, preferablygreater than 30%, preferably greater than 35%, preferably greater than40%, preferably greater than 50%, preferably greater than 60%,preferably greater than 70%. In a preferred embodiment, the method has apercent selectivity for a single desired oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon ofgreater than 10% relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products, preferably greater 15%, preferably greater than20%, preferably greater than 25%, preferably greater than 30%,preferably greater than 35%, preferably greater than 40%, preferablygreater than 50%, preferably greater than 60%, preferably greater than70% relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and 15-80%of the toluene is converted to the oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon,preferably 20-70%, preferably 25-60%, preferably 30-50%, preferably35-45% of the toluene is converted to the oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon ata reaction time of greater than 6 hours, preferably greater than 8hours, preferably greater than 10 hours, preferably greater than 12hours, preferably greater than 16 hours, preferably greater than 20hours, preferably greater than 24 hours.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and themethod has a benzaldehyde selectivity relative to a total amount ofoxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products in the range of 15-70% relative toa total amount of oxidation products, preferably 20-65%, preferably30-60%, preferably 35-55% relative to a total amount of oxidationproducts. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is tolueneand the method has a benzoic acid selectivity relative to a total amountof oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of less than 20%, preferablyless than 15%, preferably less than 12%, preferably less than 10%,preferably less than 8%, preferably less than 6%, preferably less than4%, preferably less than 2%. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclichydrocarbon is toluene and the method has a cresols selectivity relativeto a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of 30-80%,preferably 33-70%, preferably 35-65%.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and thesecond metal ions are copper (II) ions and the oxidation has the percentconversion from the cyclic hydrocarbon to oxidized cyclic hydrocarbonproducts of greater than 55%, preferably greater than 60%, preferablygreater than 62%, preferably greater than 64%, preferably greater than66%, preferably greater than 68%, preferably greater than 70%,preferably greater than 72%, preferably greater than 75%.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and thesecond metal ions are iron (II) ions and the oxidation has abenzaldehyde selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products of greater than 55% relative to a total amount ofoxidation products, preferably greater than 56%, preferably greater than57%, preferably greater than 58%, preferably greater than 59%,preferably greater than 60%, preferably greater than 61%, preferablygreater than 62%, preferably greater than 63%, preferably greater than64%, preferably greater than 65%, preferably greater than 70%,preferably greater than 75% benzaldehyde selectivity relative to a totalamount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products. In a preferredembodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and the second metal ionsare iron (II) ions and the oxidation has a cresols selectivity relativeto a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of less than40%, preferably less than 38%, preferably less than 36%, preferably lessthan 34%, preferably less than 32%, preferably less than 30%.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and themethod has a benzaldehyde selectivity relative to a total amount ofoxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products greater than or equal to abenzaldehyde selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products of a substantially similar method performed in asubstantially similar method performed in a substantially similar mannerwith a substantially similar metal organic framework catalyst lackingthe zinc (II) ions, the second metal ions or both. In a preferredembodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and the method has abenzaldehyde selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products that is at least 5 percentage points greater,preferably at least 10 percentage points, preferably at least 15percentage points, preferably at least 20 percentage points, preferablyat least 25 percentage points, preferably at least 30 percentage points,preferably at least 35 percentage points, preferably at least 40percentage points, preferably at least 45 percentage points, preferablyat least 50 percentage points, preferably at least 55 percentage points,preferably at least 60 percentage points, preferably at least 65percentage points greater than a benzaldehyde selectivity relative to atotal amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of a substantiallysimilar method performed in a substantially similar method performed ina substantially similar manner with a substantially similar metalorganic framework catalyst lacking the zinc (II) ions, the second metalions or both.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is cyclohexane and10-60% of the cyclohexane is converted to the oxidized cyclichydrocarbon, preferably 12-50%, preferably 15-40%, preferably 18-35%,preferably 20-33% of the cyclohexane is converted to the oxidized cyclichydrocarbon at a reaction time of greater than 6 hours, preferablygreater than 8 hours, preferably greater than 10 hours, preferablygreater than 12 hours, preferably greater than 16 hours, preferablygreater than 20 hours, preferably greater than 24 hours.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is cyclohexane and themethod has a cyclohexanone selectivity relative to a total amount ofoxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products in the range of 45-80% relative toa total amount of oxidation products, preferably 48-75%, preferably50-70%, preferably 55-65% relative to a total amount of oxidationproducts. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon iscyclohexanone and the method has a cyclohexanol selectivity relative toa total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of less than 50%,preferably less than 45%, preferably less than 40%, preferably less than35%, preferably less than 30%, preferably less than 25%, preferably lessthan 20%. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon iscyclohexane and the method has a 4-hydroxy cyclohexanone selectivityrelative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products and a1,4-cyclohexadione selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon products of 1-25%, preferably 2-20%, preferably5-15%.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is methylcyclohexaneand 10-60% of the methylcyclohexane is converted to the oxidized cyclichydrocarbon, preferably 12-50%, preferably 15-45%, preferably 20-40%,preferably 25-35% of the methylcyclohexane is converted to the oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon at a reaction time of greater than 6 hours,preferably greater than 8 hours, preferably greater than 10 hours,preferably greater than 12 hours, preferably greater than 16 hours,preferably greater than 20 hours, preferably greater than 24 hours.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is methylcyclohexaneand the method has a methylcyclohexanone selectivity relative to a totalamount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products in the range of 15-60%relative to a total amount of oxidation products, preferably 20-50%,preferably 30-45%, preferably 35-40% relative to a total amount ofoxidation products. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon ismethylcyclohexanone and the method has a methylcyclohexanol selectivityrelative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products ofgreater than 30%, preferably greater than 35%, preferably greater than40%, preferably greater than 45%, preferably greater than 50%,preferably greater than 55%, preferably greater than 60%, preferablygreater than 65%, preferably greater than 70%. In a preferredembodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is methylcyclohexane and the methodhas a cyclohexanone methanol selectivity relative to a total amount ofoxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products and a cyclohexanal selectivityrelative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of1-20%, preferably 2-15%, preferably 5-10%.

In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic hydrocarbon is at least oneselected from the group consisting of cyclohexane and methylcyclohexaneand 10-60% of the cyclic hydrocarbon is converted to the oxidized cyclichydrocarbon, preferably 12-50%, preferably 15-48%, preferably 20-45%,preferably 25-40% of the cyclic hydrocarbon is converted to the oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon at a reaction time of greater than 12 hours,preferably greater than 16 hours, preferably greater than 20 hours,preferably greater than 24 hours.

In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises recovering andreusing the metal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosurein any of its embodiments in at least 2 reaction iterations with a lessthan 20 percentage point decrease in conversion, a less than 20percentage point decrease in selectivity or both. In this manner themetal organic framework catalyst can be recovered and reused in at least2 reaction iterations, preferably at least 3, preferably at least 4,preferably at least 5, preferably at least 6, preferably at least 8,preferably at least 10, preferably at least 15, preferably at least 20,preferably at least 30, preferably at least 50 reaction iterations.

In certain embodiments, the metal organic framework catalyst may beseparated by removing the bag containing the metal organic frameworkcatalyst, dialysis in a solvent, or using a micro-filter or a paperfilter. The phrase recovering, reusing, and/or recycling the metalorganic framework catalyst refers to a process whereby the metal organicframework catalyst is first washed by an organic solvent, reactivated,dried and then added to a new batch of reactants (either the same or adifferent type of cyclic hydrocarbon substrate). Preferred organicsolvents for washing and/or reactivating the metal organic frameworkcatalyst include, without limitation, methanol, acetone, ethanol,tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, dichloromethane, ether, glycol ether,acetamide, dimethyl acetamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, or combinationsthereof. The metal organic framework catalyst may be dried in vacuumand/or with heating, for example, the metal organic framework catalystmay be dried in a vacuum oven. The dried metal organic frameworkcatalyst may be optionally stored prior to an additional reactioniteration.

In a preferred embodiment, there is a less than 20 percentage pointchange in percent cyclic hydrocarbon (i.e. toluene, cyclohexane,methylcyclohexane) conversion between the first and second reactioniteration, preferably less than 15 percentage points, preferably lessthan 10 percentage points, preferably less than 5 percentage points,preferably less than 4 percentage points, preferably less than 3percentage points, preferably less than 2 percentage points, preferablya less than 1 percentage point change in percent cyclic hydrocarbon(i.e. toluene, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane) conversion between thefirst and second reaction iteration. In certain embodiments, there is aless than 20 percentage point change in percent cyclic hydrocarbon (i.e.toluene, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane) conversion, preferably lessthan 15 percentage points, preferably less than 10 percentage points,preferably less than 5 percentage points, preferably less than a 2percentage point change in percent cyclic hydrocarbon (i.e. toluene,cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane) conversion between the first andtwentieth reaction iteration, preferably between the first and fifteenthreaction iteration, preferably between the first and tenth reactioniteration, preferably between the first and fifth reaction iteration,preferably between the first and fourth reaction iteration, preferablybetween, the first and third reaction iteration, preferably between thefirst and second reaction iteration.

In a preferred embodiment, there is a less than 20 percentage pointchange in percent single oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon product (i.e.benzaldehyde from toluene, cyclohexanone or cyclohexanol fromcyclohexane, methylcyclohexanol or methyl cyclohexanone frommethylcyclohexane) selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon products between the first and second reactioniteration, preferably less than 15 percentage points, preferably lessthan 10 percentage points, preferably less than 5 percentage points,preferably less than 4 percentage points, preferably less than 3percentage points, preferably less than 2 percentage points, preferablya less than 1 percentage point change in percent single oxidized cyclichydrocarbon product (i.e. benzaldehyde from toluene, cyclohexanone orcyclohexanol from cyclohexane, methylcyclohexanol or methylcyclohexanone from methylcyclohexane) selectivity relative to a totalamount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products between the first andsecond reaction iteration. In certain embodiments, there is a less than20 percentage point change in percent single oxidized cyclic hydrocarbonproduct (i.e. benzaldehyde from toluene, cyclohexanone or cyclohexanolfrom cyclohexane, methylcyclohexanol or methyl cyclohexanone frommethylcyclohexane) selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidizedcyclic hydrocarbon products, preferably less than 15 percentage points,preferably less than 10 percentage points, preferably less than 5percentage points, preferably less than a 2 percentage point change inpercent single oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon product (i.e. benzaldehydefrom toluene, cyclohexanone or cyclohexanol from cyclohexane,methylcyclohexanol or methyl cyclohexanone from methylcyclohexane)selectivity relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbonproducts between the first and twentieth reaction iteration, preferablybetween the first and fifteenth reaction iteration, preferably betweenthe first and tenth reaction iteration, preferably between the first andfifth reaction iteration, preferably between the first and fourthreaction iteration, preferably between, the first and third reactioniteration, preferably between the first and second reaction iteration.

It is equally envisaged, that the method of the present disclosureand/or the metal organic framework catalyst of the present disclosure inany of their embodiments may be adapted to provide catalysis in a widevariety of chemical transformations. Exemplary suitable chemicaltransformations include, but are not limited to, reduction ofcarbon-carbon multiple bonds, 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition,hydroxymethylation, cyanosilylation of aldehydes, Knoevenagelcondensation, alkylation of aldehydes, oxidation of olefins,cycloaddition of CO₂ and epoxides, ring opening of epoxides (oxidationof hydrocarbons), Heck coupling, oxidation of sulfides, aerobicoxidation of olefins, methanolysis of epoxides, epoxidation of olefins,oxidative self-coupling, aldol condensttion reactions, Mukaiyama aldolreaction, cyclizations, oxidation of thioethers, transesterification,Friedel-Crafts alkylation, Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, hydrogenation ofolefins, intermolecular transfer of acyl, isomerization, rearrangements,Henry reaction, Click reaction, cross-dehydrogenative coupling, alcoholoxidation, and the like. It is equally envisaged, that the method of thepresent disclosure and/or the metal organic framework catalyst of thepresent disclosure in any of their embodiments may be adapted to providea means of gas separation, gas sensing, and gas storage, in particularH₂ storage.

The examples below are intended to further illustrate protocols forpreparing and characterizing the metal organic frameworks of the presentdisclosure. Further, they are intended to illustrate assessing theproperties and applications of these metal organic frameworks. They arenot intended to limit the scope of the claims.

EXAMPLE 1

Chemicals and Materials

All reagents were used as purchased without further purification.1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylic acid (BTC), Cu(NO₃)₂.3H₂O, Co(NO₃)₂.6H₂O,Ni(NO₃)₂.6H₂O, Zn(NO₃)₂.6H₂O, FeCl₂.6H₂O, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)and ethanol were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Acetonitrile was obtainedfrom Sigma-Aldrich. Toluene, cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane were usedas purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. New 10 mL and 20 mL kimblescintillation vials were used for the synthesis of various metal organicframeworks (MOFs).

EXAMPLE 2

Synthesis of Metal Organic Frameworks (HKUST-1 and Zn-HKUST-1) andTransmetallation of ZN-HKUST-1

In a standard procedure, a mixture of Cu(NO₃)₂.3H₂O (0.438 g, 1.81 mmol)and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC) (0.236 g, 1.12 mmol) werecompletely dissolved in a solvent mixture containingN,N-dimethylformamide (2 mL), deionized water (2 mL) and ethanol (2 mL)in a tightly sealed 20 mL vial [Rowsell, J. L. C. & Yaghi, O. M J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 1304-1315.—incorporated herein by reference inits entirety]. The tightly covered vial was placed in an isothermal ovenat 85° C. for 20 hours to yield small, blue, octahedral crystals. Aftercooling the vial to room temperature, the mother liquor was decanted andthe tiny crystals were rinsed with DMF three times. The crystals werethen activated by soaking in 5 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) for 3 days atroom temperature during which DCM was decanted and freshly replenishedthree times. The crystals were dried under vacuum at 160° C. for 4 hoursyielding 0.3 g of HKUST-1 in the form of deep blue crystals. FIG. 11 isa typical schematic representation for the synthesis of HKUST-1.

Using a modified procedure, a homogeneous mixture of Zn(NO₃)₂.6H₂O (0.04g, 0.188 mmol) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC) (0.171 g, 1.12mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL N,N-dimethylformamide in a tightly sealed20 mL scintillation vial [Bhunia, M. K, Hughes, J. T. Fettinger, J. C.and Navrotsky, A. Langmuir 2013, 29, 8140-8145.—incorporated herein byreference in its entirety]. The tightly covered vial was placed in anisothermal oven at 85° C. for 16 hours to form colorless cubic crystals.After cooling the vial to room temperature, the mother liquor wasdecanted and the tiny crystals were rinsed with DMF three times. Thecrystals were then activated by soaking in methanol for 3 days at roomtemperature during which methanol was decanted and freshly replenishedthree times. The crystals were dried under vacuum at 170° C. for 4hours. FIG. 12 is a typical schematic representation for the synthesisof Zn-HKUST-1.

Pure samples of HKUST-1 and Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks (MOFs)were obtained as blue and colorless crystals, respectively. The crystalswere dried under vacuum at 120° C. and stored in air tight vials toprevent moisture. The dried samples were characterized using Fouriertransform infrared spectrophotometry (FT-IR), scanning electronmicroscopy (SEM) and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD).

Portions of the as-synthesized Zn-HKUST-1 crystals were soaked in 0.5 Mmethanolic solutions of Cu(NO₃)₂.3H₂O, Co(NO₃)₂.6H₂O, and FeCl₂.6H₂O for72 hours at 40° C. At the end of the incubation, the remaining solutionof metal ions were decanted, and the transmetallated crystals harvestedby filtration. The crystals were washed thoroughly with methanol andthen soaked in methanol for complete removal of residual metal ions. Theresulting cation exchanged MOFs were dried under reduced pressure atroom temperature.

EXAMPLE 3

Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy Analysis of PreparedMetal Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were taken on a Nicoletspectrophotometer using KBr within the standard range of 400-4000 cm⁻¹.This method was used to confirm the formation of HKUST-1, Zn-HKUST-1, aswell as the transmetallated Zn-HKUST-1 isostructural metal organicframeworks (MOFs). 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC) as a ligandshows the C═O stretching frequency of carboxylic acid around 1718 cm⁻¹and also a broad O—H peak at about 2933 cm⁻¹ which corresponds to thehydrogen bonding. FIG. 13 is the FT-IR spectrum of1,3,5-benzentricarboxylic acid (BTC). The FT-IR analysis of HKUST-1(FIG. 14) and Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 15) indicates that there was asignificant shift in the C═O stretching frequency of the BTC ligand. Thedisappearance of the broad acidic O—H peak of BTC at 2933 cm⁻¹ was theresult of deprotonation that leads to coordination. The band for theO—C—O asymmetric stretching of HKUST-1 and Zn-HKUST-1 appeared at 1658cm⁻¹ and 1640 cm⁻¹ respectively, due to the binding of the carbonyloxygen with metal atoms. The sharp peaks at 3433 cm⁻¹ for HKUST-1 (FIG.14) and 3434 cm⁻¹ for Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 15) are due to the axial H₂Oligands that are coordinated to the dimeric Cu atoms forming anoctahedral unit. Similarly, FT-IR spectra of Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 16),Co—Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 17) and Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 18) show greatsimilarity to that of Zn-HKUST-1 which indicates that there wassubstantial retention of the MOF framework after transmetallaion.

EXAMPLE 4

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) Analysis of PreparedMetal Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Tescan-Lyra-3) wasused to provide images of the synthesized catalysts. Scanning electronmicroscopy (SEM) uses a focused beam of high energy electrons togenerate a variety of signals at the surface of solid specimens. Thesignals that are derived from electron-sample interactions revealinformation about the sample including external morphology (texture),chemical composition, and crystalline structure as well as theorientation of materials making up the sample. Accelerated electron in aSEM carry significant amounts of kinetic energy, and this energy isdissipated as a variety of signals produced by electron-sampleinteractions when the incident electrons are decelerated in the solidsamples. These signals include secondary electrons (that produce SEMimages), backscattered electrons (BSE), and diffracted backscatteredelectrons (DBSE) that are used to determine crystal structures andorientations. Secondary electrons are most valuable for showingmorphology and topography of samples and backscattered electrons aremost valuable for illustrating contrasts in the composition of amultiphase sample (i.e. for rapid phase discrimination). FIG. 19 andFIG. 20 show the SEM images of the synthesized HKUST-1 catalyst atdifferent magnifications. FIG. 21 and FIG. 22 show the SEM images of thesynthesize Zn-HKUST-1 catalyst at different magnifications. The SEMimages of the synthesized catalysts are shown with the samemagnification of 2-20 μm scale bar. The micrograph images show theformation of crystalline materials as expected. HKUST-1 was observed tooccur in the form of a polyhedral (octahedral) crystal (FIG. 19 and FIG.20) with sizes of a few microns. The micrograph images of Zn-HKUST-1show the formation of polyhedral (cubic) crystals (FIG. 21 and FIG. 22)with sizes of a few microns.

EXAMPLE 5

Powder X-ray Diffraction (P-XRD) Analysis of Prepared Metal OrganicFrameworks (MOFs)

Powder X-ray diffraction (P-XRD) patterns were collected using a RigakuMiniflex II instrument with a monochromator of CuKα1 (1.5406 Å) at 30 kVand 15 mA. The PXRD patterns were recorded in the static scanning modefrom 5° to 60° (2θ) at a detector angular speed of 2° θ min-1 and stepsize of 0.02°. The wavelength of X-rays is approximately the same as thedistance between the particles in the lattice. If the beam of X-raysstrikes a crystal, the X-rays are deflected by the crystal and aredetected by a photographic plate. This technique was used to examine themorphological structure of the synthesized catalyst. The crystallinityof HKUST-1 and Zn-HKUST-1 was probed by PXRD after solvent evacuationunder reduced pressure at elevated temperatures. The diffractionpatterns show that HKUST-1 (FIG. 23) appears isostructural to Zn-HKUST-1(FIG. 24) with a slightly larger unit cell (HKUST-1, a=26.343 (0.005 Å)and Zn-HKUST-1, a=26.520 (0.001 Å)). The respective patterns werecompared to those found in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). TheCSD reference patterns were simulated using Mercury V. 3.3 and are shownin FIG. 23 and FIG. 24. Differences in peak intensities betweensimulated and experimental diffractograms can be attributed to poreocclusion by coordinated guest molecules. The powder patterns ofFe—Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 25), Co—Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG. 26) and Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 (FIG.27) show that the modified MOFs are isostructural to Zn-HKUST-1. Thiscan be confirmed as the XRD pattern of each of the modified MOFcatalysts shows a reasonable level of similarity to the confirmedZn-HKUST-1 pattern as overlaid in FIG. 25, FIG. 26, and FIG. 27.

EXAMPLE 6

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) Analysis ofPrepared Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is an analyticaltechnique which is capable of detecting metals and several non-metals atconcentrations as low as one part in 10¹⁵ (part per quadrillion, ppq).The working principle is based on the ionization of the sample with aninductively coupled plasma followed by the accurate separation andquantification of those ions with a mass spectrometer. Compared toatomic absorption spectroscopy, ICP-MS has better sensitivity, precisionand speed. Prior to ICP-MS analysis, the Fe—Zn-HKUST-1, Co—Zn-HKUST-1,and Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks were digested using a 30%HNO3 solution and the samples were further diluted to 10 ppm. The ICP-MSanalysis of Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 revealed that 34% of the Zn²⁺ in Zn-HKUST-1was replaced by Fe²⁺ indicating that the transmetallation wasincomplete. Similarly, 34% of the Zn²⁺ in Zn-HKUST-1 was replaced byCo²⁺ ions in the Co—Zn-HKUST-1 catalyst. On the other hand, the analysisof metal ions in Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 showed that 90% of the Zn²⁺ ions werereplaced by Cu²⁺.

EXAMPLE 7

Catalytic Toluene Oxidation Reactions and Analysis

The catalytic oxidation of toluene in the presence of hydrogen peroxideas an oxidizing agent was performed at 70° C. using a 10-pointelectrothermal reactor. 2 mL of toluene and 0.03 g of an activated HKUSTtype MOF catalyst was added into the reaction tube followed by theaddition of 4 mL of acetonitrile and 2 mL of H₂O₂. FIG. 28 shows thechemical equation and scheme for the oxidation of toluene. The reactionmixture was stirred and an aliquot of the samples was collected after 6,12, 18, and 24 hours for gas chromatography mass spectrometer (GC-MS)and gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) analysis.

The oxidation of toluene proceeded in the presence of H₂O₂ as anoxidizing agent using acetonitrile as solvent to give a mixture ofoxygenated products as expected. The formation of a mixture of productswas the first test of the catalytic activity of the metal organicframeworks (MOFs). The blank experiment, in the absence of an MOF didnot lead to any significant toluene conversion even after 24 hours. Theoutcome of the blank experiment was similar to what had already beenpreviously reported in the literature [Bin Du, Song-Il Kim, Lan-Lan, LouAizhong, Jia, Gaixia Liu, Ben Qi, Shuangxi Liu Applied Catalysis A:General, 2012 425, 191-198.—incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety]. HKUST-1 showed a good activity for title oxidation of toluenereaction affording a conversion of 51% after 6 hours. Table 1 summarizesthe results of toluene oxidation with HKUST-1.

TABLE 1 Results of toluene oxidation with HKUST-1 Benzole Beznyl O, M,P— Time % Benzaldehyde Acid Alcohol Cresols (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%)(%) 6 51 18 17 trace 65 12 60 19 20 trace 61 18 77 17 25 trace 58 24 8016 26 trace 58

Cresols were the major products and their amounts in the product mixturedecreased from 65% after 6 hours to 58% after 24 hours due to theformation of benzoic acids as by-product. The formation of cresols inthis reaction is not surprising as this could be as a result of thehydroxylation of the aromatic ring in the presence of peroxide. Theselectivity in benzaldehyde was also significantly decreasing from 18%in 6 hours to 16% after 24 hours as the selectivity of benzoic acid hasincreased with time. This suggests that the rate of benzoic acidformation from benzaldehyde is faster than the rate of tolueneoxidation. Despite the fact that Zn is not a good oxidation metal,Zn-HKUST-1 pushed the oxidation of toluene to 22% after 24 hours with22% selectivity. Table 2 summarizes the results of toluene oxidationwith Zn-HKUST-1. This could be attributed to the electronic structure ofthe metal organic framework (MOF) resulting from the coordination of theBTC ligand. The effect of time can also be easily observed byconsidering the significant differences in conversion and benzaldehydeselectivity with the progress of the reaction. It should be noted thatthe Zn-HKUST-1 catalyst did not favor further oxidation of benzaldehydeto benzoic acid.

TABLE 2 Results of toluene oxidation with Zn-HKUST-1 Benzole O, M, P—Time % Benzaldehyde Acid Cresols (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) 6 1.7 0 0100 12 10 8 0 92 18 19 18 0 82 24 22 22 0 78

The incorporation of Fe into the Zn-HKUST-1 framework gave a significantimprovement to the catalytic activity. Table 3 summarizes the results oftoluene oxidation with Fe—Zn-HKUST-1. Apart from the gradual initialincrease in the conversion that can be attributed to the presence of Fe,Fe—Zn-HKUST-1, clearly exemplified the unique performance of Fe inoxidation reactions, especially in terms of selectivity with thecatalyst giving the highest benzaldehyde selectivity of 61% at 6 hours.Unlike Fe—Zn-HKUST-1, Co—Zn-HKUST-1 gave similar performance toZn-HKUST-1. Table 4 summarizes the results of toluene oxidation withCo—Zn-HKUST-1. Table 5 summarizes the results of toluene oxidation withCu—Zn-HKUST-1. The catalytic activity of Cu modified Zn-HKUST-1(Cu—Zn-HKUST-1) for toluene oxidation demonstrated that Cu greatlyimproves the conversion of toluene relative to Zn-HKUST-1. After 6 hoursCu—Zn-HKUST-1 gave a conversion of 34% with 16% benzaldehydeselectivity, while Zn-HKUST on the other hand gave very low conversionwithout benzaldehyde over the same time period.

TABLE 3 Results of toluene oxidation with Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 Benzoic O, M, P—Time % Benzaldehyde Acid Cresols (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) 6 17 61 633 12 20 60 6 34 18 28 60 7 33 24 30 57 8 35

TABLE 4 Results of toluene oxidation with Co—Zn-HKUST-1 Benzoic O, M, P—Time % Benzaldehyde Acid Cresols (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) 6 1 6 0 8412 16 25 0 75 18 20 28 0 72 24 38 32 0 68

TABLE 5 Results of toluene oxidation with Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 Benzoic O, M, P—Time % Benzaldehyde Acid Cresols (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) 6 34 16 1371 12 56 14 14 72 18 65 17 17 66 24 70 18 15 67

EXAMPLE 8

Catalytic Cycloalkane Oxidation Reactions and Analysis

For the oxidation of cycloalkanes, the 10-point electrothermal reactorand stirrer was charged with a mixture containing the activated HKUSTtype MOF catalyst (0.03 g), acetonitrile (4 mL), cyclohexane ormethylcyclohexane (0.5 mL), and 2 mL of 30% H₂O₂. The mixture wasvigorously stirred and heated at 70° c. Aliquots of the reactionmixtures were taken after 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours for GC-MS and GC-FIDanalysis. FIG. 29 shows the chemical equation and scheme for theoxidation of cyclohexane. FIG. 30 shows the chemical equation and schemefor the oxidation of methylcyclohexane.

The isostructural HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks (MOFs) acted ascatalysts for the oxidation of cyclohexane with H₂O₂ at 70° C. formingcyclohexanol and cyclohexanone as major products. Table 6 summarizes theresults of cyclohexane oxidation with HKUST-1. HKUST-1 was observed tobe the most active catalyst, achieving the highest conversion of 52%which is better than those of well-known catalytic materials previouslyreported in the literature and comparable to that of modified zeolite[Goberna-Ferrón S., Lillo V., and Galán-Mascarós, R. Catal. Comm. 2012,23, 30-33.; and Bagherzadeh, M, Amini, F., Ellern, A., Woo, L. Inorg.Chem. Comm. 2012, 15, 52-55.; and Alavi, S, Hosseini-Monfared, H.,Siczek, M. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, 2013, 377, 16-28.—eachincorporated herein by reference in its entirety]. The catalyst gave aninitial low conversion of 9% but this value increased steadily as thereaction progresses to 24 hours. The great activity of HKUST-1 could belargely attributed to the heavy presence of vacant Cu sites in theframework. In contrast, Zn-HKUST-1 did not show any significant activityfor this reaction even after 24 hours. This inactivity of Zn-HKUST-1could be due to the d¹⁰ electronic configuration of the Zn metal whichis unfavorable for alkane oxidation.

TABLE 6 Results of cyclohexane oxidation with HKUST-1 Time %Cyclohexanone Cyclohexanol (hr) Converision (%) (%) 6 9 100 — 12 29 7723 18 39 60 40 24 52 60 40

Drastic improvement in activity was observed when Fe was incorporatedinto the framework of Zn-HKUST-1. Table 7 summarizes the results ofcyclohexane oxidation with Fe—Zn-HKUST-1. Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 gave the highconversion of 20% after 24 hours. Similarly, Co—Zn-HKUST-1 gave highconversion of 27% with reasonable selectivity in cyclohexanol andcyclohexanone. Table 8 summarizes the results of cyclohexane oxidationwith Co—Zn-HKUST-1. Table 9 summarizes the results of cyclohexaneoxidation with Cu—Zn-HKUST-1. Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 gave a conversion of 40%after 24 hours with an equal ratio of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone.The activity of Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 is similar to what was observed forHKUST-1 in terms of the conversion and this could be attributed to theCu atoms which are probably responsible for the relatively highconversion.

TABLE 7 Results of cyclohexane oxidation with Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 4-hydroxyCyclohex- Cyclohex- cyclohex- 1,4- Time % anone anol anonecyclohexadione (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) (%) 6 5 45 28 25 2 12 7 5926 12 3 18 13 56 21 18 5 24 20 55 20 21 4

TABLE 8 Results of cyclohexane oxidation with Co—Zn-HKUST-1 Time %Cyclohexanone Cyclohexanol (hr) Converision (%) (%) 6 2 55 25 12 9 60 4018 15 65 35 24 27 65 35

TABLE 9 Results of cyclohexane oxidation with Cu—Zn-HKUST-1 Time %Cyclohexanone Cyclohexanol (hr) Converision (%) (%) 6 7 69 31 12 15 5644 18 33 55 45 24 40 51 49

Methylcyclohexane was oxidized using the isostructural metal organicframeworks (MOFs) at 70° C. in the presence of H₂O₂ to afford reasonableyields of oxygenated products. GC-MS analysis revealed the formation of5 different oxygenated products with methylcyclohexanol andmethylcyclohexanone being the major products. HKUST-1 gave the highestconversion of 48% for this reaction after 24 hours withmethylcyclohexanol as the major product while it afforded only 18%conversion after 6 hours. Table 10 summarizes the results ofmethylcyclohexane oxidation with HKUST-1. The difference in reactiontime largely affects the conversion but has little effect on themethylcyclohexanol selectivity.

TABLE 10 Results of methylcyclohexane oxidation with HKUST-1 Methyl-Methyl- Cyclohex- cyclohex- cyclohex- ane Time % anol anone methanolCyclohexanal (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) (%) 6 18 56 27 17 trace 12 3164 11 25 trace 18 35 59 16 20 05 24 48 58 19 18 05

The modification of Zn-HKUST-1 however generally improved its activityfor methylcyclohexane oxidation. Table 11 summarizes the results ofmethylcyclohexane oxidation in the presence of Fe—Zn-HKUST-1. WithFe—Zn-HKUST-1 35 conversion of the substrate was observed in 6 hourswith approximately equal amounts of methylcyclohexanol andmethylcyclohexanone produced. There was a gradual increase in thepercent conversion to 15% after 24 hours. The effect of Fe incorporationinto the Zn-HKUST-1 framework is noteworthy since only Zn-HKUST-1 wasnot active at up to 24 hours under the same reaction conditions.Similarly, Co—Zn-HKUST showed appreciable activity over Zn-HKUST-1 dueto the presence of Co atoms in the metal organic framework (MOF). Table12 summarizes the results of methylcyclohexane oxidation withCo—Zn-HKUST-1. Table 13 summarizes the results of methylcyclohexaneoxidation with Cu—Zn-HKUST-1. Table 13 shows the results obtained forthe liquid phase oxidation of methylcyclohexane where the highestconversion of 45% was observed after 24 hours forming a higher amount ofmethylcyclohexanol.

TABLE 11 Results of methylcyclohexane oxidation with Fe—Zn-HKUST-1Methyl- Methyl- Cyclohex- cyclohex- cyclohex- ane Time % anol anonemethanol Cyclohexanal (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) (%) 6 3 42 51 trace 712 10 53 39 trace 8 18 12 49 35 3 13 24 15 45 37 8 10

TABLE 12 Results of methylcyclohexane oxidation with Co—Zn-HKUST-1Methyl- Methyl- Cyclohex- Cyclohex- Cyclohex- ane Time % anol anonemethanol Cyclohexanal (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) (%) 6 6 43 57 — trace12 7 61 33 — 6 18 10 45 51 — 4 24 14 44 39 4 13

TABLE 13 Results of methylcyclohexane oxidation with Cu—Zn-HKUST-1Methyl- Methyl- Cyclohex- cyclohex- cyclohex- ane Time % anol anonemethanol Cyclohexanal (hr) Converision (%) (%) (%) (%) 6 18 55 27 18 —12 29 65 15 20 — 18 40 60 16 20 4 24 45 66 14 17 3

The reusability of the catalysts was also examined. The HKUST-1 metalorganic framework was recovered, washed, and reactivated for two moreruns after 6 hours. The dried HKUST-1 was subjected to powder X-raydiffraction (PXRD) to ascertain if the metal organic framework (MOF) wasable to withstand the reaction conditions. The PXRD analysis revealedthat there was no collapse in the metal organic framework (MOF) after 6hours. FIG. 31 shows the great match between the patterns for the unusedand used HKUST-1 catalysts. Since the catalyst was found to bestructurally intact, the catalytic activity was tested for tolueneoxidation in two repeated runs. There was significant retention ofactivity in terms of conversion of toluene and selectivity forbenzaldehyde. FIG. 32 is a graphical illustration of the maintainedconversion and selectivity of the catalyst over three runs.

In conclusion, pure single crystals of HKUST-1 and Zn-HKUST-1 weresuccessfully synthesized using solvothermal methods and the synthesizedZn-HKUST-1 was subjected to modification via transmetallation affordingreasonable amounts of transmetallated products. Both the synthesized andmodified metal organic frameworks (MOFs) were characterized using FTIR,FESEM, PXRD, and ICP-MS. Furthermore, the catalytic activity of the MOFswas tested in the oxidation of toluene, cyclohexane andmethylcyclohexane. Fe—Zn-HKUST-1 gave the best activity in terms ofbenzaldehyde selectivity for the oxidation of toluene.

Thus, the foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplaryembodiments of the present invention. As will be understood by thoseskilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied in otherspecific forms without departing from the spirit or essentialcharacteristics thereof. Accordingly, the disclosure of the presentinvention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting of the scopeof the invention, as well as other claims. The disclosure, including anyreadily discernible variants of the teachings herein, defines, in part,the scope of the foregoing claim terminology such that no inventivesubject matter is dedicated to the public.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A metal organic framework catalyst,comprising: zinc (II) ions; second metal ionswhich are not zinc (II)ions; and benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands; wherein thebenzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid ligands comprise carboxylate groups,each carboxylate group forming a coordinative bond to the zinc (II) ionsor the second metal ions to form a coordination network in the form ofporous polyhedral crystals that are isostructural to an HKUST-1 metalorganic framework, wherein the metal organic framework catalyst does notcomprise a coordinated solvent.
 2. The metal organic framework catalystof claim 1, wherein the second metal ions are at least one selected fromthe group consisting of iron (II) ions, cobalt (II) ions, and copper(II) ions.
 3. The metal organic framework catalyst of claim 1, whereinthe ratio of zinc (II) ions to the additional metal ions is in a rangeof 0.01 to 5.0.
 4. The metal organic framework catalyst of claim 1,wherein the porous polyhedral crystals have pores with an averagediameter of 0.2-2.0 nm and a BET surface area in a range of 500-3000m²/g.
 5. The metal organic framework catalyst of claim 1, wherein theporous polyhedral crystals are octahedral or cubic with an averagelongest linear dimension in a range of 2-20 μm.
 6. The metal organicframework catalyst of claim 1 which has a larger unit cell dimension αthan the HKUST-1 metal organic framework.
 7. The metal organic frameworkcatalyst of claim 1, wherein the second metal ions are copper (II) ionsand the ratio of zinc (II) ions to copper (II) ions is in a range of0.01 to 1.0.
 8. The metal organic framework catalyst of claim 1, whereinthe second metal ions are at least one selected from the groupconsisting of iron (II) ions and cobalt (II) ions and the ratio of zinc(II) ions to the second metal ions is in a range of 0.5 to 5.0.
 9. Aprocess for producing the metal organic framework catalyst of claim 1,comprising: reacting 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid with a zinc (II)salt or hydrate in a solvent at a temperature greater than 25° C. toform a zinc modified metal organic framework; and transmetallating atleast a portion of the zinc modified metal organic framework byimmersing in a solution of a salt or hydrate of the second metal ions.10. A method for an oxidation of a cyclic hydrocarbon, comprising:contacting the cyclic hydrocarbon with the metal organic frameworkcatalyst of claim 1 in the presence of a solvent and an oxidizing agentto form an oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon.
 11. The method of claim 10,wherein the cyclic hydrocarbon is at least one selected from the groupconsisting of toluene, cyclohexane, and methylcyclohexane.
 12. Themethod of claim 10, wherein the solvent is acetonitrile and theoxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide.
 13. The method of claim 10,wherein the contacting is performed at a temperature in the range of40-100° C. for a time period of 2-36 hours.
 14. The method of claim 10,wherein the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and 15-80% of the toluene isconverted to the oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon at a reaction time ofgreater than 6 hours.
 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the cyclichydrocarbon is toluene and the method has a benzaldehyde selectivity inthe range of 15-70% relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products.
 16. The method of claim 10, wherein the cyclichydrocarbon is toluene and the method has a benzaldehyde selectivityrelative to a total amount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon productsgreater than or equal to a benzaldehyde selectivity relative to a totalamount of oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products of a substantiallysimilar method performed in a substantially similar manner with asubstantially similar metal organic framework catalyst lacking the zinc(II) ions, the second metal ions, or both.
 17. The method of claim 10,wherein the cyclic hydrocarbon is toluene and the second metal ions areiron (II) ions and the oxidation has a benzaldehyde selectivity ofgreater than 55% relative to a total amount of oxidized cyclichydrocarbon products.
 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the cyclichydrocarbon is at least one selected from the group consisting ofcyclohexane and methylcyclohexane and 10-60% of the cyclic hydrocarbonis converted to the oxidized cyclic hydrocarbon at a reaction time ofgreater than 12 hours.
 19. The method of claim 10, wherein the cyclichydrocarbon is cyclohexane and the method has a cyclohexanoneselectivity in the range of 45-80% relative to a total amount ofoxidized cyclic hydrocarbon products.
 20. The method of claim 10,further comprising recovering and reusing the metal organic frameworkcatalyst in at least 2 reaction iterations with a less than 20percentage point decrease in conversion, selectivity, or both.